Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Riley Nash Steve Downie

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRiley Nash: Goals, 0.14 a game, 41st percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.19 a game, 41st percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.33 a game, 40th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.18 a game, 25th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 1.11 a game, 49th percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 50.6%, 49th percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, -0.1, 46th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 52.0%, 64th percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +5.5 goals above replacement, 70th percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.68 xG per 60, 41st percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 8.9% a shot, 91st percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 47th percentileSteve Downie: Goals, 0.06 a game, 15th percentileSteve Downie: Assists, 0.32 a game, 70th percentileSteve Downie: Points, 0.39 a game, 47th percentileSteve Downie: Shots, 1.42 a game, 36th percentileSteve Downie: Hits, 1.13 a game, 52nd percentileSteve Downie: Corsi for %, 49.6%, 40th percentileSteve Downie: CF% rel, -0.1, 46th percentileSteve Downie: On-ice xG %, 46.0%, 20th percentileSteve Downie: Rating, -2.2 goals above replacement, 6th percentileSteve Downie: Chances created, 0.52 xG per 60, 18th percentileSteve Downie: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 19th percentileSteve Downie: Finishing, -4.6 goals above expected, 10th percentile
05101520204060Riley Nash 24Steve Downie 24

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Riley Nash
Steve Downie

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Riley Nash C, NYR 2013-14 Steve Downie R, ARI
73 Games played 62
10 Goals 4
14 Assists 20
24 Points 24
0.33 Points per game 0.39
0 Plus/minus 1
86 Shots 88
11.6 Shooting % 4.5
81 Hits 70
29 Penalty minutes 106
12:40 Average ice time 14:06
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.6 Corsi for % 49.6
-0.1 CF% relative to team -0.1
49.7 Fenwick for % 47.7
52.0 Expected goals for % 46.0
+4.3 xGF% relative to team -4.1
51.8 Goals for % 50.0
100.3 PDO 100.8
123 Shot attempts taken 133
Expected goals, all situations
10.5 Expected goals 7.6
0.68 Expected goals per 60 0.52
8.9% Chance per attempt 6.4%
-0.5 Goals above expected -4.6
Rating, in goals
+5.5 Goals above replacement -2.2
+0.9 Wins above replacement -0.4
-0.1 Even-strength offence -1.6
+2.9 Even-strength defence -2.3
-0.1 Power play -0.1
0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.3 Penalties -0.7
Contract
$575K Cap hit $2.65M
$24K Cap dollars per point $110K
$3.7M Worth at the going rate -$716K
+$3.1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$3.4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean