Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Riley Nash Chris VandeVelde

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRiley Nash: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.20 a game, 47th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.20 a game, 23rd percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 0.40 a game, 1st percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 0.20 a game, 2nd percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 50.7%, 57th percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, -2.1, 29th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 48.1%, 34th percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +0.3 goals above replacement, 26th percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.52 xG per 60, 18th percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 7.7% a shot, 57th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 46th percentileChris VandeVelde: Goals, 0.20 a game, 59th percentileChris VandeVelde: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileChris VandeVelde: Points, 0.20 a game, 23rd percentileChris VandeVelde: Shots, 0.20 a game, 1st percentileChris VandeVelde: Hits, 0.80 a game, 34th percentileChris VandeVelde: Corsi for %, 39.6%, 1st percentileChris VandeVelde: CF% rel, -5.2, 9th percentileChris VandeVelde: On-ice xG %, 43.1%, 5th percentileChris VandeVelde: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 24th percentileChris VandeVelde: Chances created, 0.05 xG per 60, 1st percentileChris VandeVelde: Shot quality, 3.9% a shot, 1st percentileChris VandeVelde: Finishing, +1.0 goals above expected, 60th percentile
00.20.40.60.81Riley Nash 1Chris VandeVelde 1

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Riley Nash
Chris VandeVelde

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Riley Nash C, NYR 2011-12 Chris VandeVelde C, PHI
5 Games played 5
0 Goals 1
1 Assists 0
1 Points 1
0.20 Points per game 0.20
1 Plus/minus 2
2 Shots 1
0.0 Shooting % 100.0
1 Hits 4
2 Penalty minutes 2
10:34 Average ice time 9:52
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.7 Corsi for % 39.6
-2.1 CF% relative to team -5.2
49.2 Fenwick for % 39.4
48.1 Expected goals for % 43.1
-1.7 xGF% relative to team -2.3
100.0 Goals for % 100.0
110.5 PDO 116.7
5 Shot attempts taken 2
Expected goals, all situations
0.5 Expected goals 0.0
0.52 Expected goals per 60 0.05
7.7% Chance per attempt 3.9%
-0.5 Goals above expected +1.0
Rating, in goals
+0.3 Goals above replacement +0.1
+0.0 Wins above replacement +0.0
-0.1 Even-strength offence -0.4
+0.5 Even-strength defence +0.5
-0.1 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill -0.2
-0.2 Penalties +0.0

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean