Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Riley Nash Jamie McGinn

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRiley Nash: Goals, 0.09 a game, 20th percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.12 a game, 24th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.21 a game, 20th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.54 a game, 45th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 0.83 a game, 41st percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 52.3%, 73rd percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, -3.4, 15th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 54.1%, 82nd percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +5.0 goals above replacement, 68th percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.72 xG per 60, 49th percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 7.9% a shot, 58th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -6.4 goals above expected, 5th percentileJamie McGinn: Goals, 0.13 a game, 34th percentileJamie McGinn: Assists, 0.11 a game, 22nd percentileJamie McGinn: Points, 0.24 a game, 24th percentileJamie McGinn: Shots, 1.61 a game, 48th percentileJamie McGinn: Hits, 1.61 a game, 77th percentileJamie McGinn: Corsi for %, 44.9%, 7th percentileJamie McGinn: CF% rel, -0.4, 43rd percentileJamie McGinn: On-ice xG %, 43.5%, 8th percentileJamie McGinn: Rating, -1.7 goals above replacement, 9th percentileJamie McGinn: Chances created, 0.72 xG per 60, 50th percentileJamie McGinn: Shot quality, 7.6% a shot, 49th percentileJamie McGinn: Finishing, -2.4 goals above expected, 27th percentile
05101520406080Riley Nash 17Jamie McGinn 17

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Riley Nash
Jamie McGinn

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Riley Nash C, NYR 2016-17 Jamie McGinn L, FLA
81 Games played 72
7 Goals 9
10 Assists 8
17 Points 17
0.21 Points per game 0.24
-1 Plus/minus -23
125 Shots 116
5.6 Shooting % 7.8
67 Hits 116
14 Penalty minutes 23
13:48 Average ice time 13:10
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
52.3 Corsi for % 44.9
-3.4 CF% relative to team -0.4
53.0 Fenwick for % 44.3
54.1 Expected goals for % 43.5
-1.7 xGF% relative to team +1.6
40.9 Goals for % 36.9
97.3 PDO 97.6
194 Shot attempts taken 156
Expected goals, all situations
13.4 Expected goals 11.4
0.72 Expected goals per 60 0.72
7.9% Chance per attempt 7.6%
-6.4 Goals above expected -2.4
Rating, in goals
+5.0 Goals above replacement -1.7
+0.8 Wins above replacement -0.3
-3.3 Even-strength offence -1.3
+3.6 Even-strength defence -2.7
0.0 Power play -0.6
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
+1.6 Penalties +0.3
Contract
$900K Cap hit $3.333M
$53K Cap dollars per point $196K
$3.8M Worth at the going rate -$478K
+$2.9M Value: worth minus cap hit -$3.8M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean