Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Riley Nash Michael Frolik

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRiley Nash: Goals, 0.08 a game, 11th percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.14 a game, 21st percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.22 a game, 16th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.00 a game, 12th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 1.06 a game, 55th percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 44.9%, 9th percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, -5.4, 8th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 49.8%, 44th percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +2.1 goals above replacement, 46th percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.43 xG per 60, 3rd percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 28th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 49th percentileMichael Frolik: Goals, 0.11 a game, 23rd percentileMichael Frolik: Assists, 0.14 a game, 21st percentileMichael Frolik: Points, 0.25 a game, 22nd percentileMichael Frolik: Shots, 1.23 a game, 24th percentileMichael Frolik: Hits, 0.56 a game, 24th percentileMichael Frolik: Corsi for %, 49.3%, 35th percentileMichael Frolik: CF% rel, -0.5, 38th percentileMichael Frolik: On-ice xG %, 45.8%, 16th percentileMichael Frolik: Rating, -1.7 goals above replacement, 7th percentileMichael Frolik: Chances created, 0.46 xG per 60, 5th percentileMichael Frolik: Shot quality, 5.7% a shot, 1st percentileMichael Frolik: Finishing, -0.4 goals above expected, 49th percentile
0510204060Riley Nash 14Michael Frolik 14

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Riley Nash
Michael Frolik

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Riley Nash C, NYR 2019-20 Michael Frolik R, MTL
64 Games played 57
5 Goals 6
9 Assists 8
14 Points 14
0.22 Points per game 0.25
6 Plus/minus -12
64 Shots 70
7.8 Shooting % 8.6
68 Hits 32
10 Penalty minutes 28
11:51 Average ice time 12:26
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.9 Corsi for % 49.3
-5.4 CF% relative to team -0.5
47.4 Fenwick for % 47.9
49.8 Expected goals for % 45.8
-2.3 xGF% relative to team -2.7
55.0 Goals for % 33.3
101.9 PDO 96.3
87 Shot attempts taken 118
Expected goals, all situations
5.5 Expected goals 5.4
0.43 Expected goals per 60 0.46
7.4% Chance per attempt 5.7%
-0.5 Goals above expected -0.4
Rating, in goals
+2.1 Goals above replacement -1.7
+0.4 Wins above replacement -0.3
-3.6 Even-strength offence -2.6
+3.7 Even-strength defence +0.7
-0.1 Power play +0.0
+0.3 Penalty kill -0.9
-0.3 Penalties -0.9
Contract
$2.75M Cap hit $4.3M
$196K Cap dollars per point $307K
$2.4M Worth at the going rate -$725K
-$301K Value: worth minus cap hit -$5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean