Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Riley Nash Jakob Silfverberg

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRiley Nash: Goals, 0.20 a game, 59th percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.34 a game, 72nd percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.54 a game, 66th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.49 a game, 38th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 1.13 a game, 59th percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 52.4%, 78th percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, -1.6, 31st percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 55.0%, 91st percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +10.5 goals above replacement, 90th percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.61 xG per 60, 26th percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 8.0% a shot, 63rd percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, +2.1 goals above expected, 68th percentileJakob Silfverberg: Goals, 0.22 a game, 65th percentileJakob Silfverberg: Assists, 0.30 a game, 66th percentileJakob Silfverberg: Points, 0.52 a game, 64th percentileJakob Silfverberg: Shots, 2.43 a game, 80th percentileJakob Silfverberg: Hits, 0.68 a game, 32nd percentileJakob Silfverberg: Corsi for %, 50.1%, 50th percentileJakob Silfverberg: CF% rel, 1.8, 69th percentileJakob Silfverberg: On-ice xG %, 50.5%, 52nd percentileJakob Silfverberg: Rating, +5.6 goals above replacement, 72nd percentileJakob Silfverberg: Chances created, 0.82 xG per 60, 64th percentileJakob Silfverberg: Shot quality, 7.2% a shot, 36th percentileJakob Silfverberg: Finishing, -1.9 goals above expected, 34th percentile
010203040204060Riley Nash 41Jakob Silfverberg 40

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Riley Nash
Jakob Silfverberg

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Riley Nash C, NYR 2017-18 Jakob Silfverberg R, ANA
76 Games played 77
15 Goals 17
26 Assists 23
41 Points 40
0.54 Points per game 0.52
16 Plus/minus 6
113 Shots 187
13.3 Shooting % 9.1
86 Hits 52
18 Penalty minutes 18
15:25 Average ice time 17:58
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
52.4 Corsi for % 50.1
-1.6 CF% relative to team +1.8
53.8 Fenwick for % 50.5
55.0 Expected goals for % 50.5
+0.3 xGF% relative to team +1.8
59.2 Goals for % 56.5
101.4 PDO 101.6
162 Shot attempts taken 275
Expected goals, all situations
11.9 Expected goals 18.9
0.61 Expected goals per 60 0.82
8.0% Chance per attempt 7.2%
+2.1 Goals above expected -1.9
Rating, in goals
+10.5 Goals above replacement +5.6
+1.7 Wins above replacement +0.9
+0.0 Even-strength offence +1.3
+5.3 Even-strength defence +0.2
+0.2 Power play -0.2
+0.4 Penalty kill -0.1
+1.3 Penalties +0.6
Contract
$900K Cap hit $3.75M
$22K Cap dollars per point $94K
$7.3M Worth at the going rate $4.2M
+$6.4M Value: worth minus cap hit +$456K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean