Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Riley Nash Peter Holland

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRiley Nash: Goals, 0.12 a game, 30th percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.25 a game, 54th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.37 a game, 42nd percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.38 a game, 35th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 1.29 a game, 53rd percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 52.9%, 71st percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, 1.1, 58th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 53.2%, 69th percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +7.7 goals above replacement, 81st percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.72 xG per 60, 51st percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 10.7% a shot, 99th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -5.3 goals above expected, 6th percentilePeter Holland: Goals, 0.18 a game, 53rd percentilePeter Holland: Assists, 0.23 a game, 48th percentilePeter Holland: Points, 0.40 a game, 48th percentilePeter Holland: Shots, 1.50 a game, 41st percentilePeter Holland: Hits, 1.60 a game, 66th percentilePeter Holland: Corsi for %, 43.9%, 12th percentilePeter Holland: CF% rel, -2.7, 21st percentilePeter Holland: On-ice xG %, 39.3%, 3rd percentilePeter Holland: Rating, +0.8 goals above replacement, 30th percentilePeter Holland: Chances created, 0.50 xG per 60, 16th percentilePeter Holland: Shot quality, 6.2% a shot, 13th percentilePeter Holland: Finishing, +3.5 goals above expected, 82nd percentile
0510152025204060Riley Nash 25Peter Holland 25

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Riley Nash
Peter Holland

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Riley Nash C, NYR 2014-15 Peter Holland C, NYR
68 Games played 62
8 Goals 11
17 Assists 14
25 Points 25
0.37 Points per game 0.40
-10 Plus/minus 0
94 Shots 93
8.5 Shooting % 11.8
88 Hits 99
12 Penalty minutes 31
16:19 Average ice time 14:31
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
52.9 Corsi for % 43.9
+1.1 CF% relative to team -2.7
52.0 Fenwick for % 43.0
53.2 Expected goals for % 39.3
+2.7 xGF% relative to team -5.7
44.8 Goals for % 51.7
97.7 PDO 102.3
126 Shot attempts taken 125
Expected goals, all situations
13.3 Expected goals 7.5
0.72 Expected goals per 60 0.50
10.7% Chance per attempt 6.2%
-5.3 Goals above expected +3.5
Rating, in goals
+7.7 Goals above replacement +0.8
+1.3 Wins above replacement +0.1
-0.1 Even-strength offence -1.5
+3.6 Even-strength defence +1.2
0.0 Power play -0.6
+0.7 Penalty kill -0.6
+0.5 Penalties -0.2
Contract
$575K Cap hit $775K
$23K Cap dollars per point $31K
$5.2M Worth at the going rate $1.1M
+$4.6M Value: worth minus cap hit +$277K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean