Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Riley Nash Marcus Kruger

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRiley Nash: Goals, 0.09 a game, 20th percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.12 a game, 24th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.21 a game, 20th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.54 a game, 45th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 0.83 a game, 41st percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 52.3%, 73rd percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, -3.4, 15th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 54.1%, 82nd percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +5.0 goals above replacement, 68th percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.72 xG per 60, 49th percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 7.9% a shot, 58th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -6.4 goals above expected, 5th percentileMarcus Kruger: Goals, 0.07 a game, 14th percentileMarcus Kruger: Assists, 0.17 a game, 37th percentileMarcus Kruger: Points, 0.24 a game, 26th percentileMarcus Kruger: Shots, 1.19 a game, 25th percentileMarcus Kruger: Hits, 0.44 a game, 14th percentileMarcus Kruger: Corsi for %, 50.7%, 57th percentileMarcus Kruger: CF% rel, 0.4, 51st percentileMarcus Kruger: On-ice xG %, 53.9%, 80th percentileMarcus Kruger: Rating, +3.2 goals above replacement, 53rd percentileMarcus Kruger: Chances created, 0.44 xG per 60, 6th percentileMarcus Kruger: Shot quality, 7.1% a shot, 32nd percentileMarcus Kruger: Finishing, -3.2 goals above expected, 18th percentile
05101520406080Riley Nash 17Marcus Kruger 17

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Riley Nash
Marcus Kruger

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Riley Nash C, NYR 2016-17 Marcus Kruger C, CHI
81 Games played 70
7 Goals 5
10 Assists 12
17 Points 17
0.21 Points per game 0.24
-1 Plus/minus 7
125 Shots 83
5.6 Shooting % 6.0
67 Hits 31
14 Penalty minutes 34
13:48 Average ice time 14:01
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
52.3 Corsi for % 50.7
-3.4 CF% relative to team +0.4
53.0 Fenwick for % 53.5
54.1 Expected goals for % 53.9
-1.7 xGF% relative to team +6.0
40.9 Goals for % 56.6
97.3 PDO 100.4
194 Shot attempts taken 105
Expected goals, all situations
13.4 Expected goals 7.2
0.72 Expected goals per 60 0.44
7.9% Chance per attempt 7.1%
-6.4 Goals above expected -3.2
Rating, in goals
+5.0 Goals above replacement +3.2
+0.8 Wins above replacement +0.5
-3.3 Even-strength offence -2.0
+3.6 Even-strength defence +4.5
0.0 Power play -0.1
+0.0 Penalty kill -0.5
+1.6 Penalties -1.4
Contract
$900K Cap hit $3.083M
$53K Cap dollars per point $181K
$3.8M Worth at the going rate $2.6M
+$2.9M Value: worth minus cap hit -$502K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean