Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2018-19 season

At a glance

Riley Nash Marcus Kruger

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRiley Nash: Goals, 0.04 a game, 3rd percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.12 a game, 14th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.15 a game, 6th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.01 a game, 14th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 0.92 a game, 46th percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 48.8%, 38th percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, -1.7, 30th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 51.8%, 63rd percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +2.6 goals above replacement, 48th percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 4th percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 7.0% a shot, 19th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -4.8 goals above expected, 10th percentileMarcus Kruger: Goals, 0.05 a game, 7th percentileMarcus Kruger: Assists, 0.11 a game, 12th percentileMarcus Kruger: Points, 0.16 a game, 7th percentileMarcus Kruger: Shots, 1.00 a game, 12th percentileMarcus Kruger: Hits, 0.69 a game, 30th percentileMarcus Kruger: Corsi for %, 48.1%, 30th percentileMarcus Kruger: CF% rel, -2.0, 25th percentileMarcus Kruger: On-ice xG %, 47.4%, 28th percentileMarcus Kruger: Rating, +0.3 goals above replacement, 25th percentileMarcus Kruger: Chances created, 0.50 xG per 60, 5th percentileMarcus Kruger: Shot quality, 7.2% a shot, 27th percentileMarcus Kruger: Finishing, -2.4 goals above expected, 31st percentile
0510204060Riley Nash 12Marcus Kruger 12

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Riley Nash
Marcus Kruger

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Riley Nash C, NYR 2018-19 Marcus Kruger C, CHI
78 Games played 74
3 Goals 4
9 Assists 8
12 Points 12
0.15 Points per game 0.16
-8 Plus/minus -2
79 Shots 74
3.8 Shooting % 5.4
72 Hits 51
19 Penalty minutes 30
10:50 Average ice time 10:25
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.8 Corsi for % 48.1
-1.7 CF% relative to team -2.0
50.8 Fenwick for % 50.0
51.8 Expected goals for % 47.4
+1.1 xGF% relative to team +1.7
34.8 Goals for % 47.7
95.5 PDO 99.1
121 Shot attempts taken 88
Expected goals, all situations
6.8 Expected goals 6.4
0.48 Expected goals per 60 0.50
7.0% Chance per attempt 7.2%
-4.8 Goals above expected -2.4
Rating, in goals
+2.6 Goals above replacement +0.3
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.1
-4.0 Even-strength offence -3.2
+4.6 Even-strength defence +3.2
-0.1 Power play 0.0
-0.1 Penalty kill -0.9
-0.1 Penalties -0.9
Contract
$2.75M Cap hit $3.083M
$229K Cap dollars per point $257K
$2.4M Worth at the going rate $840K
-$308K Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean