Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Riley Nash Austin Watson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRiley Nash: Goals, 0.09 a game, 20th percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.12 a game, 24th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.21 a game, 20th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.54 a game, 45th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 0.83 a game, 41st percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 52.3%, 73rd percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, -3.4, 15th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 54.1%, 82nd percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +5.0 goals above replacement, 68th percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.72 xG per 60, 49th percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 7.9% a shot, 58th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -6.4 goals above expected, 5th percentileAustin Watson: Goals, 0.06 a game, 12th percentileAustin Watson: Assists, 0.16 a game, 31st percentileAustin Watson: Points, 0.22 a game, 22nd percentileAustin Watson: Shots, 1.17 a game, 24th percentileAustin Watson: Hits, 1.86 a game, 81st percentileAustin Watson: Corsi for %, 45.1%, 8th percentileAustin Watson: CF% rel, -8.3, 3rd percentileAustin Watson: On-ice xG %, 47.8%, 30th percentileAustin Watson: Rating, +2.2 goals above replacement, 45th percentileAustin Watson: Chances created, 0.45 xG per 60, 7th percentileAustin Watson: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 13th percentileAustin Watson: Finishing, -2.3 goals above expected, 29th percentile
05101520406080Riley Nash 17Austin Watson 17

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Riley Nash
Austin Watson

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Riley Nash C, NYR 2016-17 Austin Watson L, DET
81 Games played 77
7 Goals 5
10 Assists 12
17 Points 17
0.21 Points per game 0.22
-1 Plus/minus 14
125 Shots 90
5.6 Shooting % 5.6
67 Hits 143
14 Penalty minutes 99
13:48 Average ice time 12:26
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
52.3 Corsi for % 45.1
-3.4 CF% relative to team -8.3
53.0 Fenwick for % 46.8
54.1 Expected goals for % 47.8
-1.7 xGF% relative to team -5.0
40.9 Goals for % 58.5
97.3 PDO 102.3
194 Shot attempts taken 144
Expected goals, all situations
13.4 Expected goals 7.3
0.72 Expected goals per 60 0.45
7.9% Chance per attempt 6.4%
-6.4 Goals above expected -2.3
Rating, in goals
+5.0 Goals above replacement +2.2
+0.8 Wins above replacement +0.4
-3.3 Even-strength offence -3.4
+3.6 Even-strength defence +3.3
0.0 Power play -0.1
+0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
+1.6 Penalties -0.2
Contract
$900K Cap hit $575K
$53K Cap dollars per point $34K
$3.8M Worth at the going rate $2M
+$2.9M Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean