Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Riley Nash Matt Nieto

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRiley Nash: Goals, 0.14 a game, 41st percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.19 a game, 41st percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.33 a game, 40th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.18 a game, 25th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 1.11 a game, 49th percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 50.6%, 49th percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, -0.1, 46th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 52.0%, 64th percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +5.5 goals above replacement, 70th percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.68 xG per 60, 41st percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 8.9% a shot, 91st percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 47th percentileMatt Nieto: Goals, 0.15 a game, 46th percentileMatt Nieto: Assists, 0.21 a game, 47th percentileMatt Nieto: Points, 0.36 a game, 46th percentileMatt Nieto: Shots, 1.88 a game, 59th percentileMatt Nieto: Hits, 0.11 a game, 1st percentileMatt Nieto: Corsi for %, 52.0%, 67th percentileMatt Nieto: CF% rel, -2.7, 23rd percentileMatt Nieto: On-ice xG %, 58.0%, 94th percentileMatt Nieto: Rating, +5.6 goals above replacement, 71st percentileMatt Nieto: Chances created, 0.87 xG per 60, 76th percentileMatt Nieto: Shot quality, 8.6% a shot, 85th percentileMatt Nieto: Finishing, -3.5 goals above expected, 18th percentile
05101520204060Riley Nash 24Matt Nieto 24

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Riley Nash
Matt Nieto

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Riley Nash C, NYR 2013-14 Matt Nieto L, PIT
73 Games played 66
10 Goals 10
14 Assists 14
24 Points 24
0.33 Points per game 0.36
0 Plus/minus -4
86 Shots 124
11.6 Shooting % 8.1
81 Hits 7
29 Penalty minutes 16
12:40 Average ice time 14:05
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.6 Corsi for % 52.0
-0.1 CF% relative to team -2.7
49.7 Fenwick for % 53.3
52.0 Expected goals for % 58.0
+4.3 xGF% relative to team +1.7
51.8 Goals for % 46.3
100.3 PDO 98.4
123 Shot attempts taken 181
Expected goals, all situations
10.5 Expected goals 13.5
0.68 Expected goals per 60 0.87
8.9% Chance per attempt 8.6%
-0.5 Goals above expected -3.5
Rating, in goals
+5.5 Goals above replacement +5.6
+0.9 Wins above replacement +0.9
-0.1 Even-strength offence +0.7
+2.9 Even-strength defence +1.7
-0.1 Power play -0.2
0.0 Penalty kill +0.4
+0.3 Penalties +0.5
Contract
$575K Cap hit $759K
$24K Cap dollars per point $32K
$3.7M Worth at the going rate $3.7M
+$3.1M Value: worth minus cap hit +$3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean