Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2018-19 season

At a glance

Riley Nash Tage Thompson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRiley Nash: Goals, 0.04 a game, 3rd percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.12 a game, 14th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.15 a game, 6th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.01 a game, 14th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 0.92 a game, 46th percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 48.8%, 38th percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, -1.7, 30th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 51.8%, 63rd percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +2.6 goals above replacement, 48th percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 4th percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 7.0% a shot, 19th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -4.8 goals above expected, 10th percentileTage Thompson: Goals, 0.11 a game, 25th percentileTage Thompson: Assists, 0.08 a game, 5th percentileTage Thompson: Points, 0.18 a game, 11th percentileTage Thompson: Shots, 1.66 a game, 49th percentileTage Thompson: Hits, 1.02 a game, 52nd percentileTage Thompson: Corsi for %, 47.1%, 20th percentileTage Thompson: CF% rel, -3.1, 16th percentileTage Thompson: On-ice xG %, 41.7%, 3rd percentileTage Thompson: Rating, -4.2 goals above replacement, 1st percentileTage Thompson: Chances created, 0.69 xG per 60, 37th percentileTage Thompson: Shot quality, 5.8% a shot, 1st percentileTage Thompson: Finishing, -2.1 goals above expected, 34th percentile
0510204060Riley Nash 12Tage Thompson 12

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Riley Nash
Tage Thompson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Riley Nash C, NYR 2018-19 Tage Thompson C, BUF
78 Games played 65
3 Goals 7
9 Assists 5
12 Points 12
0.15 Points per game 0.18
-8 Plus/minus -22
79 Shots 108
3.8 Shooting % 6.5
72 Hits 66
19 Penalty minutes 20
10:50 Average ice time 12:08
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.8 Corsi for % 47.1
-1.7 CF% relative to team -3.1
50.8 Fenwick for % 46.7
51.8 Expected goals for % 41.7
+1.1 xGF% relative to team -7.0
34.8 Goals for % 29.2
95.5 PDO 95.7
121 Shot attempts taken 181
Expected goals, all situations
6.8 Expected goals 9.1
0.48 Expected goals per 60 0.69
7.0% Chance per attempt 5.8%
-4.8 Goals above expected -2.1
Rating, in goals
+2.6 Goals above replacement -4.2
+0.4 Wins above replacement -0.7
-4.0 Even-strength offence -3.2
+4.6 Even-strength defence -2.1
-0.1 Power play -0.6
-0.1 Penalty kill -0.1
-0.1 Penalties -0.4
Contract
$2.75M Cap hit $925K
$229K Cap dollars per point $77K
$2.4M Worth at the going rate -$2.2M
-$308K Value: worth minus cap hit -$3.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean