Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2018-19 season

At a glance

Riley Nash Kiefer Sherwood

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRiley Nash: Goals, 0.04 a game, 3rd percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.12 a game, 14th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.15 a game, 6th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.01 a game, 14th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 0.92 a game, 46th percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 48.8%, 38th percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, -1.7, 30th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 51.8%, 63rd percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +2.6 goals above replacement, 48th percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 4th percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 7.0% a shot, 19th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -4.8 goals above expected, 10th percentileKiefer Sherwood: Goals, 0.12 a game, 30th percentileKiefer Sherwood: Assists, 0.12 a game, 17th percentileKiefer Sherwood: Points, 0.24 a game, 20th percentileKiefer Sherwood: Shots, 1.20 a game, 24th percentileKiefer Sherwood: Hits, 1.58 a game, 74th percentileKiefer Sherwood: Corsi for %, 45.5%, 10th percentileKiefer Sherwood: CF% rel, -1.9, 26th percentileKiefer Sherwood: On-ice xG %, 40.8%, 2nd percentileKiefer Sherwood: Rating, -1.6 goals above replacement, 8th percentileKiefer Sherwood: Chances created, 0.65 xG per 60, 27th percentileKiefer Sherwood: Shot quality, 6.9% a shot, 16th percentileKiefer Sherwood: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 53rd percentile
0510204060Riley Nash 12Kiefer Sherwood 12

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Riley Nash
Kiefer Sherwood

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Riley Nash C, NYR 2018-19 Kiefer Sherwood L, SJS
78 Games played 50
3 Goals 6
9 Assists 6
12 Points 12
0.15 Points per game 0.24
-8 Plus/minus 1
79 Shots 60
3.8 Shooting % 10.0
72 Hits 79
19 Penalty minutes 8
10:50 Average ice time 11:22
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.8 Corsi for % 45.5
-1.7 CF% relative to team -1.9
50.8 Fenwick for % 44.7
51.8 Expected goals for % 40.8
+1.1 xGF% relative to team -4.1
34.8 Goals for % 50.0
95.5 PDO 102.0
121 Shot attempts taken 108
Expected goals, all situations
6.8 Expected goals 6.1
0.48 Expected goals per 60 0.65
7.0% Chance per attempt 6.9%
-4.8 Goals above expected -0.1
Rating, in goals
+2.6 Goals above replacement -1.6
+0.4 Wins above replacement -0.3
-4.0 Even-strength offence -1.6
+4.6 Even-strength defence -1.8
-0.1 Power play -0.1
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.1
-0.1 Penalties +0.2
Contract
$2.75M Cap hit $925K
$229K Cap dollars per point $77K
$2.4M Worth at the going rate -$481K
-$308K Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean