Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Thomas Hickey Chris Tanev

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerThomas Hickey: Goals, 0.10 a game, 77th percentileThomas Hickey: Assists, 0.19 a game, 51st percentileThomas Hickey: Points, 0.29 a game, 63rd percentileThomas Hickey: Shots, 0.89 a game, 25th percentileThomas Hickey: Hits, 1.05 a game, 43rd percentileThomas Hickey: Corsi for %, 48.1%, 29th percentileThomas Hickey: CF% rel, -1.0, 41st percentileThomas Hickey: On-ice xG %, 47.4%, 23rd percentileThomas Hickey: Rating, +2.4 goals above replacement, 55th percentileThomas Hickey: Chances created, 0.20 xG per 60, 53rd percentileThomas Hickey: Shot quality, 3.5% a shot, 71st percentileThomas Hickey: Finishing, +2.5 goals above expected, 86th percentileChris Tanev: Goals, 0.06 a game, 54th percentileChris Tanev: Assists, 0.20 a game, 55th percentileChris Tanev: Points, 0.26 a game, 56th percentileChris Tanev: Shots, 0.61 a game, 6th percentileChris Tanev: Hits, 0.26 a game, 2nd percentileChris Tanev: Corsi for %, 49.4%, 42nd percentileChris Tanev: CF% rel, 2.1, 76th percentileChris Tanev: On-ice xG %, 48.1%, 31st percentileChris Tanev: Rating, +8.0 goals above replacement, 87th percentileChris Tanev: Chances created, 0.08 xG per 60, 5th percentileChris Tanev: Shot quality, 3.4% a shot, 61st percentileChris Tanev: Finishing, +1.9 goals above expected, 83rd percentile
051015204060Thomas Hickey 18Chris Tanev 18

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Thomas Hickey
Chris Tanev

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Thomas Hickey D, NYI 2015-16 Chris Tanev D, TOR
62 Games played 69
6 Goals 4
12 Assists 14
18 Points 18
0.29 Points per game 0.26
9 Plus/minus -8
55 Shots 42
10.9 Shooting % 9.5
65 Hits 18
30 Penalty minutes 8
17:24 Average ice time 21:45
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.1 Corsi for % 49.4
-1.0 CF% relative to team +2.1
48.7 Fenwick for % 51.7
47.4 Expected goals for % 48.1
-2.3 xGF% relative to team +5.0
57.6 Goals for % 44.2
103.2 PDO 97.5
133 Shot attempts taken 80
Expected goals, all situations
3.5 Expected goals 2.1
0.20 Expected goals per 60 0.08
3.5% Chance per attempt 3.4%
+2.5 Goals above expected +1.9
Rating, in goals
+2.4 Goals above replacement +8.0
+0.4 Wins above replacement +1.3
+0.4 Even-strength offence -2.9
-0.5 Even-strength defence +6.2
-0.3 Power play -0.7
-0.1 Penalty kill -0.9
-0.7 Penalties +1.3
Contract
$2.2M Cap hit $4.45M
$122K Cap dollars per point $247K
$2.1M Worth at the going rate $5.6M
-$101K Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean