Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Paul Postma Toby Enstrom

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerPaul Postma: Goals, 0.02 a game, 16th percentilePaul Postma: Assists, 0.20 a game, 52nd percentilePaul Postma: Points, 0.22 a game, 40th percentilePaul Postma: Shots, 0.77 a game, 10th percentilePaul Postma: Hits, 0.55 a game, 13th percentilePaul Postma: Corsi for %, 48.4%, 33rd percentilePaul Postma: CF% rel, -1.9, 26th percentilePaul Postma: On-ice xG %, 47.2%, 26th percentilePaul Postma: Rating, -0.4 goals above replacement, 28th percentilePaul Postma: Chances created, 0.19 xG per 60, 50th percentilePaul Postma: Shot quality, 3.2% a shot, 57th percentilePaul Postma: Finishing, -1.2 goals above expected, 29th percentileToby Enstrom: Goals, 0.02 a game, 16th percentileToby Enstrom: Assists, 0.22 a game, 55th percentileToby Enstrom: Points, 0.23 a game, 46th percentileToby Enstrom: Shots, 0.77 a game, 10th percentileToby Enstrom: Hits, 0.40 a game, 6th percentileToby Enstrom: Corsi for %, 49.3%, 46th percentileToby Enstrom: CF% rel, -1.3, 33rd percentileToby Enstrom: On-ice xG %, 50.8%, 59th percentileToby Enstrom: Rating, -0.7 goals above replacement, 23rd percentileToby Enstrom: Chances created, 0.08 xG per 60, 2nd percentileToby Enstrom: Shot quality, 2.6% a shot, 21st percentileToby Enstrom: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 40th percentile
0510204060Paul Postma 14Toby Enstrom 14

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Paul Postma
Toby Enstrom

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Paul Postma D, BOS 2016-17 Toby Enstrom D, WPG
65 Games played 60
1 Goals 1
13 Assists 13
14 Points 14
0.22 Points per game 0.23
3 Plus/minus -7
50 Shots 46
2.0 Shooting % 2.2
36 Hits 24
15 Penalty minutes 42
10:51 Average ice time 21:54
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.4 Corsi for % 49.3
-1.9 CF% relative to team -1.3
48.0 Fenwick for % 48.9
47.2 Expected goals for % 50.8
-4.9 xGF% relative to team +0.7
52.9 Goals for % 42.2
101.3 PDO 97.6
119 Shot attempts taken 92
Expected goals, all situations
2.2 Expected goals 1.7
0.19 Expected goals per 60 0.08
3.2% Chance per attempt 2.6%
-1.2 Goals above expected -0.7
Rating, in goals
-0.4 Goals above replacement -0.7
-0.1 Wins above replacement -0.1
+0.1 Even-strength offence -3.3
-1.6 Even-strength defence +0.5
+0.0 Power play -0.5
+0.0 Penalty kill -0.5
-1.2 Penalties -1.3
Contract
$888K Cap hit $5.75M
$63K Cap dollars per point $411K
$340K Worth at the going rate $153K
-$548K Value: worth minus cap hit -$5.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean