Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Scott Darling Anders Nilsson

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerScott Darling: Save %, 0.915, 40th percentileScott Darling: Goals against, 2.31 a game, 55th percentileScott Darling: Workload, 27.0 shots a game, 47th percentileScott Darling: Games, 29 games, 29th percentileScott Darling: Goals saved, -0.10 above expected per 60, 30th percentileAnders Nilsson: Save %, 0.901, 8th percentileAnders Nilsson: Goals against, 2.69 a game, 5th percentileAnders Nilsson: Workload, 27.2 shots a game, 48th percentileAnders Nilsson: Games, 29 games, 29th percentileAnders Nilsson: Goals saved, -0.29 above expected per 60, 14th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Scott Darling G, CAR 2015-16 Anders Nilsson G, OTT
29 Games played 29
12 Wins 10
8 Losses 13
1 Shutouts 0
784 Shots against 789
717 Saves 711
67 Goals against 78
0.915 Save % 0.901
2.58 Goals against average 3.12
Expected goals, while he was in net
64.3 Expected goals against 70.8
-2.7 Goals saved above expected -7.2
-0.10 Saved above expected per 60 -0.29
6.0% Chance per attempt faced 6.5%
Rating, in goals
+3.9 Goals above replacement +0.1
+0.6 Wins above replacement +0.0
Contract
$588K Cap hit $1M
$1.5M Worth at the going rate $588K
+$918K Value: worth minus cap hit -$412K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean