Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Joakim Andersson Kevin Porter

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJoakim Andersson: Goals, 0.03 a game, 6th percentileJoakim Andersson: Assists, 0.07 a game, 11th percentileJoakim Andersson: Points, 0.10 a game, 6th percentileJoakim Andersson: Shots, 0.59 a game, 2nd percentileJoakim Andersson: Hits, 0.48 a game, 15th percentileJoakim Andersson: Corsi for %, 48.5%, 33rd percentileJoakim Andersson: CF% rel, -2.3, 22nd percentileJoakim Andersson: On-ice xG %, 49.6%, 46th percentileJoakim Andersson: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 25th percentileJoakim Andersson: Chances created, 0.49 xG per 60, 12th percentileJoakim Andersson: Shot quality, 8.5% a shot, 79th percentileJoakim Andersson: Finishing, -1.1 goals above expected, 42nd percentileKevin Porter: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileKevin Porter: Assists, 0.07 a game, 11th percentileKevin Porter: Points, 0.07 a game, 3rd percentileKevin Porter: Shots, 0.83 a game, 8th percentileKevin Porter: Hits, 2.34 a game, 90th percentileKevin Porter: Corsi for %, 48.7%, 35th percentileKevin Porter: CF% rel, -5.3, 8th percentileKevin Porter: On-ice xG %, 51.5%, 61st percentileKevin Porter: Rating, +0.9 goals above replacement, 31st percentileKevin Porter: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 11th percentileKevin Porter: Shot quality, 8.1% a shot, 69th percentileKevin Porter: Finishing, -3.7 goals above expected, 19th percentile
01232040Joakim Andersson 3Kevin Porter 3

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Joakim Andersson
Kevin Porter

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Joakim Andersson C, DET 2015-16 Kevin Porter C, PIT
29 Games played 41
1 Goals 0
2 Assists 3
3 Points 3
0.10 Points per game 0.07
1 Plus/minus -2
17 Shots 34
5.9 Shooting % 0.0
14 Hits 96
6 Penalty minutes 0
9:01 Average ice time 11:19
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.5 Corsi for % 48.7
-2.3 CF% relative to team -5.3
47.9 Fenwick for % 49.4
49.6 Expected goals for % 51.5
+2.8 xGF% relative to team -6.1
55.6 Goals for % 37.5
102.1 PDO 98.0
28 Shot attempts taken 52
Expected goals, all situations
2.1 Expected goals 3.7
0.49 Expected goals per 60 0.48
8.5% Chance per attempt 8.1%
-1.1 Goals above expected -3.7
Rating, in goals
+0.1 Goals above replacement +0.9
+0.0 Wins above replacement +0.1
-0.3 Even-strength offence -3.0
-0.3 Even-strength defence +1.4
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.2 Penalty kill +0.5
-0.1 Penalties +0.7
Contract
$815K Cap hit $575K
$272K Cap dollars per point $192K
$622K Worth at the going rate $1.1M
-$193K Value: worth minus cap hit +$547K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean