Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2018-19 season

At a glance

Jake Gardiner Nate Schmidt

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJake Gardiner: Goals, 0.05 a game, 39th percentileJake Gardiner: Assists, 0.44 a game, 89th percentileJake Gardiner: Points, 0.48 a game, 82nd percentileJake Gardiner: Shots, 1.26 a game, 42nd percentileJake Gardiner: Hits, 0.98 a game, 33rd percentileJake Gardiner: Corsi for %, 51.7%, 72nd percentileJake Gardiner: CF% rel, 1.0, 58th percentileJake Gardiner: On-ice xG %, 53.3%, 79th percentileJake Gardiner: Rating, +2.2 goals above replacement, 57th percentileJake Gardiner: Chances created, 0.18 xG per 60, 35th percentileJake Gardiner: Shot quality, 2.9% a shot, 41st percentileJake Gardiner: Finishing, -0.9 goals above expected, 39th percentileNate Schmidt: Goals, 0.15 a game, 90th percentileNate Schmidt: Assists, 0.34 a game, 80th percentileNate Schmidt: Points, 0.49 a game, 83rd percentileNate Schmidt: Shots, 1.84 a game, 78th percentileNate Schmidt: Hits, 0.61 a game, 12th percentileNate Schmidt: Corsi for %, 50.6%, 62nd percentileNate Schmidt: CF% rel, -5.0, 7th percentileNate Schmidt: On-ice xG %, 52.2%, 72nd percentileNate Schmidt: Rating, +2.1 goals above replacement, 55th percentileNate Schmidt: Chances created, 0.25 xG per 60, 69th percentileNate Schmidt: Shot quality, 3.6% a shot, 68th percentileNate Schmidt: Finishing, +0.5 goals above expected, 66th percentile
0102030204060Jake Gardiner 30Nate Schmidt 30

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Jake Gardiner
Nate Schmidt

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Jake Gardiner D, CAR 2018-19 Nate Schmidt D, UTA
62 Games played 61
3 Goals 9
27 Assists 21
30 Points 30
0.48 Points per game 0.49
19 Plus/minus 22
78 Shots 112
3.8 Shooting % 8.0
61 Hits 37
26 Penalty minutes 8
21:13 Average ice time 21:57
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.7 Corsi for % 50.6
+1.0 CF% relative to team -5.0
49.6 Fenwick for % 51.0
53.3 Expected goals for % 52.2
+3.2 xGF% relative to team -4.1
61.5 Goals for % 55.9
104.1 PDO 101.7
195 Shot attempts taken 174
Expected goals, all situations
3.9 Expected goals 5.5
0.18 Expected goals per 60 0.25
2.9% Chance per attempt 3.6%
-0.9 Goals above expected +0.5
Rating, in goals
+2.2 Goals above replacement +2.1
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.4
+1.0 Even-strength offence -2.7
-0.8 Even-strength defence -0.6
-0.7 Power play +0.4
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.6
-1.7 Penalties -0.1
Contract
$4.05M Cap hit $2.225M
$135K Cap dollars per point $74K
$2.1M Worth at the going rate $2.1M
-$1.9M Value: worth minus cap hit -$141K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean