Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Jimmy Hayes Garnet Hathaway

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJimmy Hayes: Goals, 0.03 a game, 4th percentileJimmy Hayes: Assists, 0.05 a game, 7th percentileJimmy Hayes: Points, 0.09 a game, 3rd percentileJimmy Hayes: Shots, 1.28 a game, 30th percentileJimmy Hayes: Hits, 1.28 a game, 65th percentileJimmy Hayes: Corsi for %, 51.5%, 67th percentileJimmy Hayes: CF% rel, -3.5, 15th percentileJimmy Hayes: On-ice xG %, 49.8%, 48th percentileJimmy Hayes: Rating, -1.9 goals above replacement, 6th percentileJimmy Hayes: Chances created, 0.74 xG per 60, 54th percentileJimmy Hayes: Shot quality, 6.7% a shot, 21st percentileJimmy Hayes: Finishing, -4.6 goals above expected, 13th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Goals, 0.04 a game, 5th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Assists, 0.15 a game, 31st percentileGarnet Hathaway: Points, 0.19 a game, 17th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shots, 0.85 a game, 7th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Hits, 2.15 a game, 89th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Corsi for %, 44.6%, 6th percentileGarnet Hathaway: CF% rel, -5.4, 7th percentileGarnet Hathaway: On-ice xG %, 42.9%, 5th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Rating, +0.7 goals above replacement, 30th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Chances created, 0.59 xG per 60, 23rd percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shot quality, 7.5% a shot, 47th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Finishing, -1.3 goals above expected, 40th percentile
0123452040Jimmy Hayes 5Garnet Hathaway 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Jimmy Hayes
Garnet Hathaway

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Jimmy Hayes R, NJD 2016-17 Garnet Hathaway R, FLA
58 Games played 26
2 Goals 1
3 Assists 4
5 Points 5
0.09 Points per game 0.19
-3 Plus/minus 0
74 Shots 22
2.7 Shooting % 4.5
74 Hits 56
29 Penalty minutes 44
9:14 Average ice time 9:08
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.5 Corsi for % 44.6
-3.5 CF% relative to team -5.4
50.1 Fenwick for % 43.4
49.8 Expected goals for % 42.9
-6.8 xGF% relative to team -7.4
45.9 Goals for % 50.0
98.6 PDO 102.5
130 Shot attempts taken 38
Expected goals, all situations
6.6 Expected goals 2.3
0.74 Expected goals per 60 0.59
6.7% Chance per attempt 7.5%
-4.6 Goals above expected -1.3
Rating, in goals
-1.9 Goals above replacement +0.7
-0.3 Wins above replacement +0.1
-2.4 Even-strength offence -0.9
-0.5 Even-strength defence +0.4
-0.2 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.3 Penalties +0.5
Contract
$2.3M Cap hit $690K
$460K Cap dollars per point $138K
-$645K Worth at the going rate $1.1M
-$2.9M Value: worth minus cap hit +$362K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean