Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Lance Bouma John Mitchell

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerLance Bouma: Goals, 0.05 a game, 9th percentileLance Bouma: Assists, 0.07 a game, 9th percentileLance Bouma: Points, 0.11 a game, 6th percentileLance Bouma: Shots, 0.87 a game, 9th percentileLance Bouma: Hits, 2.08 a game, 87th percentileLance Bouma: Corsi for %, 46.6%, 16th percentileLance Bouma: CF% rel, -5.0, 8th percentileLance Bouma: On-ice xG %, 47.1%, 24th percentileLance Bouma: Rating, +1.6 goals above replacement, 37th percentileLance Bouma: Chances created, 0.49 xG per 60, 10th percentileLance Bouma: Shot quality, 7.2% a shot, 37th percentileLance Bouma: Finishing, -2.6 goals above expected, 24th percentileJohn Mitchell: Goals, 0.05 a game, 7th percentileJohn Mitchell: Assists, 0.06 a game, 9th percentileJohn Mitchell: Points, 0.11 a game, 5th percentileJohn Mitchell: Shots, 0.88 a game, 10th percentileJohn Mitchell: Hits, 1.35 a game, 68th percentileJohn Mitchell: Corsi for %, 49.3%, 39th percentileJohn Mitchell: CF% rel, 1.5, 62nd percentileJohn Mitchell: On-ice xG %, 41.9%, 3rd percentileJohn Mitchell: Rating, -2.0 goals above replacement, 6th percentileJohn Mitchell: Chances created, 0.37 xG per 60, 1st percentileJohn Mitchell: Shot quality, 5.9% a shot, 5th percentileJohn Mitchell: Finishing, -2.0 goals above expected, 32nd percentile
0246204060Lance Bouma 7John Mitchell 7

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Lance Bouma
John Mitchell

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Lance Bouma L, CHI 2016-17 John Mitchell C, COL
61 Games played 65
3 Goals 3
4 Assists 4
7 Points 7
0.11 Points per game 0.11
-2 Plus/minus -12
53 Shots 57
5.7 Shooting % 5.3
127 Hits 88
35 Penalty minutes 45
11:21 Average ice time 12:33
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.6 Corsi for % 49.3
-5.0 CF% relative to team +1.5
48.3 Fenwick for % 46.9
47.1 Expected goals for % 41.9
-2.5 xGF% relative to team -3.1
47.4 Goals for % 31.4
99.7 PDO 97.1
83 Shot attempts taken 121
Expected goals, all situations
5.6 Expected goals 5.0
0.49 Expected goals per 60 0.37
7.2% Chance per attempt 5.9%
-2.6 Goals above expected -2.0
Rating, in goals
+1.6 Goals above replacement -2.0
+0.3 Wins above replacement -0.3
-3.9 Even-strength offence -5.3
+3.2 Even-strength defence +2.8
-0.1 Power play -0.2
+0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.4 Penalties -1.5
Contract
$2.2M Cap hit $1.8M
$314K Cap dollars per point $257K
$1.6M Worth at the going rate -$669K
-$580K Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean