Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

James Wright Tim Jackman

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJames Wright: Goals, 0.05 a game, 12th percentileJames Wright: Assists, 0.08 a game, 14th percentileJames Wright: Points, 0.13 a game, 11th percentileJames Wright: Shots, 0.84 a game, 11th percentileJames Wright: Hits, 1.13 a game, 50th percentileJames Wright: Corsi for %, 44.7%, 12th percentileJames Wright: CF% rel, -5.8, 10th percentileJames Wright: On-ice xG %, 44.0%, 12th percentileJames Wright: Rating, +0.3 goals above replacement, 26th percentileJames Wright: Chances created, 0.37 xG per 60, 4th percentileJames Wright: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 19th percentileJames Wright: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 42nd percentileTim Jackman: Goals, 0.02 a game, 5th percentileTim Jackman: Assists, 0.10 a game, 19th percentileTim Jackman: Points, 0.12 a game, 10th percentileTim Jackman: Shots, 1.00 a game, 16th percentileTim Jackman: Hits, 2.33 a game, 90th percentileTim Jackman: Corsi for %, 48.0%, 33rd percentileTim Jackman: CF% rel, -0.2, 50th percentileTim Jackman: On-ice xG %, 45.8%, 22nd percentileTim Jackman: Rating, +0.8 goals above replacement, 34th percentileTim Jackman: Chances created, 0.81 xG per 60, 68th percentileTim Jackman: Shot quality, 7.5% a shot, 52nd percentileTim Jackman: Finishing, -3.3 goals above expected, 12th percentile
0123452040James Wright 5Tim Jackman 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

James Wright
Tim Jackman

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

James Wright C, WPG 2012-13 Tim Jackman R, ANA
38 Games played 42
2 Goals 1
3 Assists 4
5 Points 5
0.13 Points per game 0.12
-5 Plus/minus -9
32 Shots 42
6.3 Shooting % 2.4
43 Hits 98
31 Penalty minutes 76
11:36 Average ice time 7:36
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.7 Corsi for % 48.0
-5.8 CF% relative to team -0.2
45.6 Fenwick for % 48.7
44.0 Expected goals for % 45.8
-7.2 xGF% relative to team -3.1
40.0 Goals for % 26.3
98.3 PDO 94.6
52 Shot attempts taken 66
Expected goals, all situations
2.7 Expected goals 4.3
0.37 Expected goals per 60 0.81
6.4% Chance per attempt 7.5%
-0.7 Goals above expected -3.3
Rating, in goals
+0.3 Goals above replacement +0.8
+0.0 Wins above replacement +0.1
-2.7 Even-strength offence -0.7
+0.2 Even-strength defence +0.4
+0.0 Power play +0.4
+0.1 Penalty kill +0.0
+1.4 Penalties -0.1
Contract
$650K Cap hit $612K
$130K Cap dollars per point $122K
$749K Worth at the going rate $1.2M
+$99K Value: worth minus cap hit +$604K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean