Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

James Wright Brian Boyle

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJames Wright: Goals, 0.05 a game, 12th percentileJames Wright: Assists, 0.08 a game, 14th percentileJames Wright: Points, 0.13 a game, 11th percentileJames Wright: Shots, 0.84 a game, 11th percentileJames Wright: Hits, 1.13 a game, 50th percentileJames Wright: Corsi for %, 44.7%, 12th percentileJames Wright: CF% rel, -5.8, 10th percentileJames Wright: On-ice xG %, 44.0%, 12th percentileJames Wright: Rating, +0.3 goals above replacement, 26th percentileJames Wright: Chances created, 0.37 xG per 60, 4th percentileJames Wright: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 19th percentileJames Wright: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 42nd percentileBrian Boyle: Goals, 0.05 a game, 12th percentileBrian Boyle: Assists, 0.08 a game, 14th percentileBrian Boyle: Points, 0.13 a game, 11th percentileBrian Boyle: Shots, 1.47 a game, 43rd percentileBrian Boyle: Hits, 3.82 a game, 99th percentileBrian Boyle: Corsi for %, 50.1%, 53rd percentileBrian Boyle: CF% rel, -3.1, 22nd percentileBrian Boyle: On-ice xG %, 47.9%, 35th percentileBrian Boyle: Rating, -1.6 goals above replacement, 7th percentileBrian Boyle: Chances created, 0.58 xG per 60, 28th percentileBrian Boyle: Shot quality, 6.3% a shot, 17th percentileBrian Boyle: Finishing, -4.3 goals above expected, 6th percentile
01234520James Wright 5Brian Boyle 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

James Wright
Brian Boyle

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

James Wright C, WPG 2012-13 Brian Boyle C, PIT
38 Games played 38
2 Goals 2
3 Assists 3
5 Points 5
0.13 Points per game 0.13
-5 Plus/minus -13
32 Shots 56
6.3 Shooting % 3.6
43 Hits 145
31 Penalty minutes 29
11:36 Average ice time 14:13
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.7 Corsi for % 50.1
-5.8 CF% relative to team -3.1
45.6 Fenwick for % 51.9
44.0 Expected goals for % 47.9
-7.2 xGF% relative to team -5.1
40.0 Goals for % 22.7
98.3 PDO 94.1
52 Shot attempts taken 90
Expected goals, all situations
2.7 Expected goals 5.3
0.37 Expected goals per 60 0.58
6.4% Chance per attempt 6.3%
-0.7 Goals above expected -4.3
Rating, in goals
+0.3 Goals above replacement -1.6
+0.0 Wins above replacement -0.3
-2.7 Even-strength offence -3.2
+0.2 Even-strength defence +0.8
+0.0 Power play +0.1
+0.1 Penalty kill -0.6
+1.4 Penalties -0.2
Contract
$650K Cap hit $1.7M
$130K Cap dollars per point $340K
$749K Worth at the going rate -$873K
+$99K Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean