Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

James Wright Colin Fraser

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJames Wright: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileJames Wright: Assists, 0.03 a game, 4th percentileJames Wright: Points, 0.03 a game, 1st percentileJames Wright: Shots, 0.69 a game, 7th percentileJames Wright: Hits, 1.07 a game, 47th percentileJames Wright: Corsi for %, 47.6%, 26th percentileJames Wright: CF% rel, -2.7, 24th percentileJames Wright: On-ice xG %, 46.9%, 28th percentileJames Wright: Rating, +0.0 goals above replacement, 25th percentileJames Wright: Chances created, 0.54 xG per 60, 21st percentileJames Wright: Shot quality, 9.1% a shot, 94th percentileJames Wright: Finishing, -5.1 goals above expected, 7th percentileColin Fraser: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileColin Fraser: Assists, 0.06 a game, 9th percentileColin Fraser: Points, 0.06 a game, 3rd percentileColin Fraser: Shots, 0.67 a game, 7th percentileColin Fraser: Hits, 1.76 a game, 77th percentileColin Fraser: Corsi for %, 52.1%, 67th percentileColin Fraser: CF% rel, -6.5, 5th percentileColin Fraser: On-ice xG %, 47.0%, 29th percentileColin Fraser: Rating, -0.2 goals above replacement, 23rd percentileColin Fraser: Chances created, 0.43 xG per 60, 7th percentileColin Fraser: Shot quality, 6.5% a shot, 21st percentileColin Fraser: Finishing, -2.1 goals above expected, 31st percentile
00.511.522040James Wright 2Colin Fraser 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

James Wright
Colin Fraser

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

James Wright C, WPG 2013-14 Colin Fraser C, STL
59 Games played 33
0 Goals 0
2 Assists 2
2 Points 2
0.03 Points per game 0.06
-3 Plus/minus -4
41 Shots 22
0.0 Shooting % 0.0
63 Hits 58
15 Penalty minutes 30
9:35 Average ice time 8:59
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.6 Corsi for % 52.1
-2.7 CF% relative to team -6.5
48.8 Fenwick for % 51.5
46.9 Expected goals for % 47.0
-4.9 xGF% relative to team -9.9
42.3 Goals for % 25.0
97.9 PDO 96.0
67 Shot attempts taken 39
Expected goals, all situations
5.1 Expected goals 2.1
0.54 Expected goals per 60 0.43
9.1% Chance per attempt 6.5%
-5.1 Goals above expected -2.1
Rating, in goals
+0.0 Goals above replacement -0.2
+0.0 Wins above replacement 0.0
-3.6 Even-strength offence -2.2
+1.6 Even-strength defence +0.7
0.0 Power play -0.1
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.2
+0.6 Penalties +0.4
Contract
$650K Cap hit $825K
$325K Cap dollars per point $413K
$557K Worth at the going rate $435K
-$93K Value: worth minus cap hit -$390K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean