Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2018-19 season

At a glance

Derek Grant Joel Eriksson Ek

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDerek Grant: Goals, 0.07 a game, 11th percentileDerek Grant: Assists, 0.18 a game, 34th percentileDerek Grant: Points, 0.25 a game, 21st percentileDerek Grant: Shots, 1.32 a game, 29th percentileDerek Grant: Hits, 1.64 a game, 76th percentileDerek Grant: Corsi for %, 48.2%, 31st percentileDerek Grant: CF% rel, -1.7, 29th percentileDerek Grant: On-ice xG %, 49.9%, 47th percentileDerek Grant: Rating, +1.1 goals above replacement, 34th percentileDerek Grant: Chances created, 0.53 xG per 60, 11th percentileDerek Grant: Shot quality, 6.1% a shot, 3rd percentileDerek Grant: Finishing, -1.8 goals above expected, 36th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Goals, 0.12 a game, 31st percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Assists, 0.12 a game, 17th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Points, 0.24 a game, 20th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Shots, 1.91 a game, 61st percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Hits, 2.02 a game, 85th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Corsi for %, 51.2%, 63rd percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: CF% rel, 0.4, 55th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: On-ice xG %, 55.2%, 86th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Rating, +4.6 goals above replacement, 64th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Chances created, 0.89 xG per 60, 68th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Shot quality, 8.4% a shot, 67th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Finishing, -4.6 goals above expected, 12th percentile
05102040Derek Grant 14Joel Eriksson Ek 14

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Derek Grant
Joel Eriksson Ek

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Derek Grant C, ANA 2018-19 Joel Eriksson Ek C, MIN
56 Games played 58
4 Goals 7
10 Assists 7
14 Points 14
0.25 Points per game 0.24
-6 Plus/minus -7
74 Shots 111
5.4 Shooting % 6.3
92 Hits 117
14 Penalty minutes 20
11:41 Average ice time 13:30
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.2 Corsi for % 51.2
-1.7 CF% relative to team +0.4
49.0 Fenwick for % 52.0
49.9 Expected goals for % 55.2
+0.2 xGF% relative to team +1.4
44.7 Goals for % 44.6
98.8 PDO 96.7
108 Shot attempts taken 157
Expected goals, all situations
5.8 Expected goals 11.6
0.53 Expected goals per 60 0.89
6.1% Chance per attempt 8.4%
-1.8 Goals above expected -4.6
Rating, in goals
+1.1 Goals above replacement +4.6
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.8
-0.8 Even-strength offence +0.9
+0.8 Even-strength defence +0.9
-0.1 Power play -0.2
0.0 Penalty kill +0.2
-0.5 Penalties +0.6
Contract
$650K Cap hit $894K
$46K Cap dollars per point $64K
$1.4M Worth at the going rate $3.8M
+$761K Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.9M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean