Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Greg Pateryn Jonathan Ericsson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerGreg Pateryn: Goals, 0.03 a game, 24th percentileGreg Pateryn: Assists, 0.22 a game, 57th percentileGreg Pateryn: Points, 0.25 a game, 52nd percentileGreg Pateryn: Shots, 1.17 a game, 41st percentileGreg Pateryn: Hits, 1.92 a game, 79th percentileGreg Pateryn: Corsi for %, 51.3%, 71st percentileGreg Pateryn: CF% rel, 1.1, 67th percentileGreg Pateryn: On-ice xG %, 52.7%, 77th percentileGreg Pateryn: Rating, +1.8 goals above replacement, 51st percentileGreg Pateryn: Chances created, 0.16 xG per 60, 39th percentileGreg Pateryn: Shot quality, 2.3% a shot, 15th percentileGreg Pateryn: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 46th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Goals, 0.02 a game, 17th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Assists, 0.16 a game, 34th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Points, 0.18 a game, 25th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Shots, 0.84 a game, 13th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Hits, 1.69 a game, 72nd percentileJonathan Ericsson: Corsi for %, 46.5%, 13th percentileJonathan Ericsson: CF% rel, -1.5, 32nd percentileJonathan Ericsson: On-ice xG %, 46.5%, 19th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Rating, -2.5 goals above replacement, 5th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Chances created, 0.11 xG per 60, 13th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Shot quality, 2.6% a shot, 25th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Finishing, -0.8 goals above expected, 36th percentile
024682040Greg Pateryn 9Jonathan Ericsson 9

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Greg Pateryn
Jonathan Ericsson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Greg Pateryn D, ANA 2016-17 Jonathan Ericsson D, DET
36 Games played 51
1 Goals 1
8 Assists 8
9 Points 9
0.25 Points per game 0.18
-1 Plus/minus -2
42 Shots 43
2.4 Shooting % 2.3
69 Hits 86
10 Penalty minutes 63
15:25 Average ice time 19:13
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.3 Corsi for % 46.5
+1.1 CF% relative to team -1.5
51.8 Fenwick for % 45.7
52.7 Expected goals for % 46.5
+2.7 xGF% relative to team -1.9
48.8 Goals for % 50.7
98.7 PDO 102.1
89 Shot attempts taken 87
Expected goals, all situations
1.5 Expected goals 1.8
0.16 Expected goals per 60 0.11
2.3% Chance per attempt 2.6%
-0.5 Goals above expected -0.8
Rating, in goals
+1.8 Goals above replacement -2.5
+0.3 Wins above replacement -0.4
+0.1 Even-strength offence -1.2
+0.6 Even-strength defence -2.7
+0.0 Power play -0.1
0.0 Penalty kill -0.4
-0.8 Penalties -1.4
Contract
$800K Cap hit $4.25M
$89K Cap dollars per point $472K
$1.7M Worth at the going rate -$1M
+$913K Value: worth minus cap hit -$5.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean