Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Mark Borowiecki Tom Gilbert

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMark Borowiecki: Goals, 0.02 a game, 17th percentileMark Borowiecki: Assists, 0.02 a game, 2nd percentileMark Borowiecki: Points, 0.03 a game, 1st percentileMark Borowiecki: Shots, 0.43 a game, 2nd percentileMark Borowiecki: Hits, 4.30 a game, 99th percentileMark Borowiecki: Corsi for %, 45.0%, 7th percentileMark Borowiecki: CF% rel, -3.5, 17th percentileMark Borowiecki: On-ice xG %, 43.8%, 5th percentileMark Borowiecki: Rating, -3.4 goals above replacement, 3rd percentileMark Borowiecki: Chances created, 0.07 xG per 60, 3rd percentileMark Borowiecki: Shot quality, 2.7% a shot, 29th percentileMark Borowiecki: Finishing, -1.1 goals above expected, 32nd percentileTom Gilbert: Goals, 0.02 a game, 22nd percentileTom Gilbert: Assists, 0.02 a game, 2nd percentileTom Gilbert: Points, 0.04 a game, 3rd percentileTom Gilbert: Shots, 0.80 a game, 17th percentileTom Gilbert: Hits, 0.64 a game, 15th percentileTom Gilbert: Corsi for %, 49.3%, 40th percentileTom Gilbert: CF% rel, -4.6, 9th percentileTom Gilbert: On-ice xG %, 50.3%, 56th percentileTom Gilbert: Rating, +0.0 goals above replacement, 30th percentileTom Gilbert: Chances created, 0.10 xG per 60, 14th percentileTom Gilbert: Shot quality, 2.8% a shot, 33rd percentileTom Gilbert: Finishing, -0.3 goals above expected, 48th percentile
00.511.52204060Mark Borowiecki 2Tom Gilbert 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Mark Borowiecki
Tom Gilbert

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Mark Borowiecki D, NSH 2015-16 Tom Gilbert D, LAK
63 Games played 45
1 Goals 1
1 Assists 1
2 Points 2
0.03 Points per game 0.04
-4 Plus/minus 3
27 Shots 36
3.7 Shooting % 2.8
271 Hits 29
107 Penalty minutes 12
14:38 Average ice time 16:52
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.0 Corsi for % 49.3
-3.5 CF% relative to team -4.6
44.4 Fenwick for % 50.5
43.8 Expected goals for % 50.3
-3.8 xGF% relative to team -2.4
39.1 Goals for % 46.2
98.8 PDO 98.4
56 Shot attempts taken 72
Expected goals, all situations
1.1 Expected goals 1.3
0.07 Expected goals per 60 0.10
2.7% Chance per attempt 2.8%
-1.1 Goals above expected -0.3
Rating, in goals
-3.4 Goals above replacement +0.0
-0.6 Wins above replacement +0.0
-3.1 Even-strength offence -2.6
-0.9 Even-strength defence +0.8
0.0 Power play 0.0
-0.9 Penalty kill 0.0
-1.5 Penalties -0.6
Contract
$1.1M Cap hit $2.8M
$550K Cap dollars per point $1.4M
-$1.6M Worth at the going rate $592K
-$2.7M Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean