Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Mark Borowiecki Chris Tanev

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMark Borowiecki: Goals, 0.06 a game, 47th percentileMark Borowiecki: Assists, 0.15 a game, 32nd percentileMark Borowiecki: Points, 0.21 a game, 35th percentileMark Borowiecki: Shots, 1.27 a game, 43rd percentileMark Borowiecki: Hits, 4.35 a game, 99th percentileMark Borowiecki: Corsi for %, 46.5%, 14th percentileMark Borowiecki: CF% rel, 0.5, 55th percentileMark Borowiecki: On-ice xG %, 48.7%, 39th percentileMark Borowiecki: Rating, +5.4 goals above replacement, 78th percentileMark Borowiecki: Chances created, 0.25 xG per 60, 73rd percentileMark Borowiecki: Shot quality, 3.2% a shot, 58th percentileMark Borowiecki: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 45th percentileChris Tanev: Goals, 0.05 a game, 37th percentileChris Tanev: Assists, 0.21 a game, 54th percentileChris Tanev: Points, 0.26 a game, 50th percentileChris Tanev: Shots, 0.74 a game, 6th percentileChris Tanev: Hits, 0.50 a game, 9th percentileChris Tanev: Corsi for %, 47.9%, 25th percentileChris Tanev: CF% rel, -0.9, 38th percentileChris Tanev: On-ice xG %, 45.6%, 13th percentileChris Tanev: Rating, +2.5 goals above replacement, 55th percentileChris Tanev: Chances created, 0.07 xG per 60, 1st percentileChris Tanev: Shot quality, 2.3% a shot, 14th percentileChris Tanev: Finishing, +1.1 goals above expected, 64th percentile
05102040Mark Borowiecki 11Chris Tanev 11

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Mark Borowiecki
Chris Tanev

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Mark Borowiecki D, NSH 2017-18 Chris Tanev D, TOR
52 Games played 42
3 Goals 2
8 Assists 9
11 Points 11
0.21 Points per game 0.26
-6 Plus/minus 7
66 Shots 31
4.5 Shooting % 6.5
226 Hits 21
64 Penalty minutes 8
14:39 Average ice time 19:47
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.5 Corsi for % 47.9
+0.5 CF% relative to team -0.9
48.9 Fenwick for % 47.0
48.7 Expected goals for % 45.6
+5.4 xGF% relative to team -0.6
44.1 Goals for % 50.8
98.3 PDO 101.2
128 Shot attempts taken 45
Expected goals, all situations
3.1 Expected goals 0.9
0.25 Expected goals per 60 0.07
3.2% Chance per attempt 2.3%
-0.1 Goals above expected +1.1
Rating, in goals
+5.4 Goals above replacement +2.5
+0.9 Wins above replacement +0.4
+0.9 Even-strength offence -1.9
+2.0 Even-strength defence +0.9
0.0 Power play -0.1
+0.4 Penalty kill +0.8
-0.4 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$1.1M Cap hit $4.45M
$100K Cap dollars per point $405K
$4.1M Worth at the going rate $2.2M
+$3M Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean