Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Philip Larsen Tim Erixon

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerPhilip Larsen: Goals, 0.06 a game, 52nd percentilePhilip Larsen: Assists, 0.09 a game, 16th percentilePhilip Larsen: Points, 0.16 a game, 25th percentilePhilip Larsen: Shots, 0.94 a game, 34th percentilePhilip Larsen: Hits, 1.56 a game, 67th percentilePhilip Larsen: Corsi for %, 45.9%, 15th percentilePhilip Larsen: CF% rel, -1.6, 33rd percentilePhilip Larsen: On-ice xG %, 43.0%, 6th percentilePhilip Larsen: Rating, -2.4 goals above replacement, 5th percentilePhilip Larsen: Chances created, 0.14 xG per 60, 32nd percentilePhilip Larsen: Shot quality, 2.8% a shot, 30th percentilePhilip Larsen: Finishing, +0.9 goals above expected, 72nd percentileTim Erixon: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileTim Erixon: Assists, 0.16 a game, 39th percentileTim Erixon: Points, 0.16 a game, 26th percentileTim Erixon: Shots, 0.68 a game, 13th percentileTim Erixon: Hits, 0.65 a game, 19th percentileTim Erixon: Corsi for %, 47.5%, 29th percentileTim Erixon: CF% rel, 0.7, 61st percentileTim Erixon: On-ice xG %, 45.7%, 17th percentileTim Erixon: Rating, -0.3 goals above replacement, 26th percentileTim Erixon: Chances created, 0.13 xG per 60, 28th percentileTim Erixon: Shot quality, 3.1% a shot, 46th percentileTim Erixon: Finishing, -1.0 goals above expected, 20th percentile
01234520Philip Larsen 5Tim Erixon 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Philip Larsen
Tim Erixon

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Philip Larsen D, VAN 2012-13 Tim Erixon D, TOR
32 Games played 31
2 Goals 0
3 Assists 5
5 Points 5
0.16 Points per game 0.16
-10 Plus/minus 4
30 Shots 21
6.7 Shooting % 0.0
50 Hits 20
18 Penalty minutes 14
14:53 Average ice time 15:42
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.9 Corsi for % 47.5
-1.6 CF% relative to team +0.7
43.1 Fenwick for % 45.5
43.0 Expected goals for % 45.7
-4.2 xGF% relative to team -0.3
37.5 Goals for % 57.1
98.8 PDO 104.1
58 Shot attempts taken 46
Expected goals, all situations
1.1 Expected goals 1.0
0.14 Expected goals per 60 0.13
2.8% Chance per attempt 3.1%
+0.9 Goals above expected -1.0
Rating, in goals
-2.4 Goals above replacement -0.3
-0.4 Wins above replacement 0.0
-1.6 Even-strength offence -1.1
-0.7 Even-strength defence -0.5
0.0 Power play +0.1
-0.6 Penalty kill +0.0
-1.1 Penalties -0.4
Contract
$1.025M Cap hit $900K
$205K Cap dollars per point $180K
-$1.5M Worth at the going rate $291K
-$2.5M Value: worth minus cap hit -$609K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean