Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Cam Atkinson Richard Park

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerCam Atkinson: Goals, 0.26 a game, 75th percentileCam Atkinson: Assists, 0.26 a game, 59th percentileCam Atkinson: Points, 0.52 a game, 65th percentileCam Atkinson: Shots, 2.44 a game, 80th percentileCam Atkinson: Hits, 0.85 a game, 37th percentileCam Atkinson: Corsi for %, 50.3%, 54th percentileCam Atkinson: CF% rel, 6.0, 93rd percentileCam Atkinson: On-ice xG %, 55.1%, 88th percentileCam Atkinson: Rating, +3.4 goals above replacement, 58th percentileCam Atkinson: Chances created, 1.02 xG per 60, 87th percentileCam Atkinson: Shot quality, 8.3% a shot, 77th percentileCam Atkinson: Finishing, -1.0 goals above expected, 43rd percentileRichard Park: Goals, 0.13 a game, 41st percentileRichard Park: Assists, 0.13 a game, 29th percentileRichard Park: Points, 0.26 a game, 33rd percentileRichard Park: Shots, 0.81 a game, 10th percentileRichard Park: Hits, 0.52 a game, 15th percentileRichard Park: Corsi for %, 51.1%, 60th percentileRichard Park: CF% rel, -3.6, 19th percentileRichard Park: On-ice xG %, 48.5%, 38th percentileRichard Park: Rating, -0.2 goals above replacement, 21st percentileRichard Park: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 11th percentileRichard Park: Shot quality, 7.6% a shot, 54th percentileRichard Park: Finishing, +2.3 goals above expected, 70th percentile
05102040Cam Atkinson 14Richard Park 14

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Cam Atkinson
Richard Park

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Cam Atkinson R, TBL 2011-12 Richard Park R, PIT
27 Games played 54
7 Goals 7
7 Assists 7
14 Points 14
0.52 Points per game 0.26
1 Plus/minus -1
66 Shots 44
10.6 Shooting % 15.9
23 Hits 28
14 Penalty minutes 12
15:23 Average ice time 10:55
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.3 Corsi for % 51.1
+6.0 CF% relative to team -3.6
52.6 Fenwick for % 51.8
55.1 Expected goals for % 48.5
+9.5 xGF% relative to team -5.4
52.6 Goals for % 48.6
99.6 PDO 99.2
93 Shot attempts taken 76
Expected goals, all situations
7.0 Expected goals 4.7
1.02 Expected goals per 60 0.48
8.3% Chance per attempt 7.6%
-1.0 Goals above expected +2.3
Rating, in goals
+3.4 Goals above replacement -0.2
+0.6 Wins above replacement 0.0
+2.7 Even-strength offence -2.3
+0.4 Even-strength defence -0.4
-0.3 Power play +0.3
0.0 Penalty kill +0.2
-0.4 Penalties +0.4

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean