Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Teemu Hartikainen Trevor Smith

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTeemu Hartikainen: Goals, 0.12 a game, 37th percentileTeemu Hartikainen: Assists, 0.18 a game, 41st percentileTeemu Hartikainen: Points, 0.29 a game, 41st percentileTeemu Hartikainen: Shots, 1.41 a game, 40th percentileTeemu Hartikainen: Hits, 2.12 a game, 88th percentileTeemu Hartikainen: Corsi for %, 43.1%, 4th percentileTeemu Hartikainen: CF% rel, -1.8, 33rd percentileTeemu Hartikainen: On-ice xG %, 49.3%, 45th percentileTeemu Hartikainen: Rating, +1.1 goals above replacement, 35th percentileTeemu Hartikainen: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 22nd percentileTeemu Hartikainen: Shot quality, 7.0% a shot, 37th percentileTeemu Hartikainen: Finishing, 0.0 goals above expected, 51st percentileTrevor Smith: Goals, 0.13 a game, 39th percentileTrevor Smith: Assists, 0.19 a game, 45th percentileTrevor Smith: Points, 0.31 a game, 42nd percentileTrevor Smith: Shots, 1.06 a game, 21st percentileTrevor Smith: Hits, 1.19 a game, 55th percentileTrevor Smith: Corsi for %, 42.7%, 3rd percentileTrevor Smith: CF% rel, 1.3, 61st percentileTrevor Smith: On-ice xG %, 41.1%, 3rd percentileTrevor Smith: Rating, -0.1 goals above replacement, 22nd percentileTrevor Smith: Chances created, 0.59 xG per 60, 27th percentileTrevor Smith: Shot quality, 9.8% a shot, 97th percentileTrevor Smith: Finishing, +0.0 goals above expected, 53rd percentile
012345Teemu Hartikainen 5Trevor Smith 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Teemu Hartikainen
Trevor Smith

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Teemu Hartikainen C, EDM 2011-12 Trevor Smith C, NSH
17 Games played 16
2 Goals 2
3 Assists 3
5 Points 5
0.29 Points per game 0.31
1 Plus/minus 2
24 Shots 17
8.3 Shooting % 11.8
36 Hits 19
6 Penalty minutes 4
13:01 Average ice time 12:28
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
43.1 Corsi for % 42.7
-1.8 CF% relative to team +1.3
43.4 Fenwick for % 42.9
49.3 Expected goals for % 41.1
+6.5 xGF% relative to team -0.6
50.0 Goals for % 52.9
101.5 PDO 105.3
36 Shot attempts taken 24
Expected goals, all situations
2.0 Expected goals 2.0
0.55 Expected goals per 60 0.59
7.0% Chance per attempt 9.8%
0.0 Goals above expected +0.0
Rating, in goals
+1.1 Goals above replacement -0.1
+0.2 Wins above replacement 0.0
+0.1 Even-strength offence -0.3
+0.5 Even-strength defence +0.0
0.0 Power play -0.2
0.0 Penalty kill -0.1
-0.1 Penalties -0.1

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean