Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Teemu Hartikainen Paul Byron

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTeemu Hartikainen: Goals, 0.12 a game, 37th percentileTeemu Hartikainen: Assists, 0.18 a game, 41st percentileTeemu Hartikainen: Points, 0.29 a game, 41st percentileTeemu Hartikainen: Shots, 1.41 a game, 40th percentileTeemu Hartikainen: Hits, 2.12 a game, 88th percentileTeemu Hartikainen: Corsi for %, 43.1%, 4th percentileTeemu Hartikainen: CF% rel, -1.8, 33rd percentileTeemu Hartikainen: On-ice xG %, 49.3%, 45th percentileTeemu Hartikainen: Rating, +1.1 goals above replacement, 35th percentileTeemu Hartikainen: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 22nd percentileTeemu Hartikainen: Shot quality, 7.0% a shot, 37th percentileTeemu Hartikainen: Finishing, 0.0 goals above expected, 51st percentilePaul Byron: Goals, 0.14 a game, 44th percentilePaul Byron: Assists, 0.09 a game, 19th percentilePaul Byron: Points, 0.23 a game, 28th percentilePaul Byron: Shots, 0.59 a game, 4th percentilePaul Byron: Hits, 1.18 a game, 54th percentilePaul Byron: Corsi for %, 42.6%, 3rd percentilePaul Byron: CF% rel, -1.4, 34th percentilePaul Byron: On-ice xG %, 49.3%, 45th percentilePaul Byron: Rating, +1.3 goals above replacement, 37th percentilePaul Byron: Chances created, 0.53 xG per 60, 20th percentilePaul Byron: Shot quality, 12.5% a shot, 99th percentilePaul Byron: Finishing, +1.0 goals above expected, 60th percentile
01234520Teemu Hartikainen 5Paul Byron 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Teemu Hartikainen
Paul Byron

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Teemu Hartikainen C, EDM 2011-12 Paul Byron L, MTL
17 Games played 22
2 Goals 3
3 Assists 2
5 Points 5
0.29 Points per game 0.23
1 Plus/minus 3
24 Shots 13
8.3 Shooting % 23.1
36 Hits 26
6 Penalty minutes 2
13:01 Average ice time 10:14
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
43.1 Corsi for % 42.6
-1.8 CF% relative to team -1.4
43.4 Fenwick for % 43.3
49.3 Expected goals for % 49.3
+6.5 xGF% relative to team +4.8
50.0 Goals for % 77.8
101.5 PDO 106.2
36 Shot attempts taken 21
Expected goals, all situations
2.0 Expected goals 2.0
0.55 Expected goals per 60 0.53
7.0% Chance per attempt 12.5%
0.0 Goals above expected +1.0
Rating, in goals
+1.1 Goals above replacement +1.3
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.2
+0.1 Even-strength offence -0.5
+0.5 Even-strength defence +0.8
0.0 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.1 Penalties +0.4

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean