Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Anders Lindback Curtis McElhinney

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerAnders Lindback: Save %, 0.894, 5th percentileAnders Lindback: Goals against, 2.47 a game, 34th percentileAnders Lindback: Workload, 23.3 shots a game, 3rd percentileAnders Lindback: Games, 19 games, 5th percentileAnders Lindback: Goals saved, -0.65 above expected per 60, 2nd percentileCurtis McElhinney: Save %, 0.890, 2nd percentileCurtis McElhinney: Goals against, 2.56 a game, 21st percentileCurtis McElhinney: Workload, 23.2 shots a game, 2nd percentileCurtis McElhinney: Games, 18 games, 3rd percentileCurtis McElhinney: Goals saved, -0.29 above expected per 60, 14th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Anders Lindback G, NSH 2015-16 Curtis McElhinney G, TBL
19 Games played 18
5 Wins 2
7 Losses 7
0 Shutouts 0
443 Shots against 417
396 Saves 371
47 Goals against 46
0.894 Save % 0.890
3.11 Goals against average 3.30
Expected goals, while he was in net
37.1 Expected goals against 41.9
-9.9 Goals saved above expected -4.1
-0.65 Saved above expected per 60 -0.29
6.0% Chance per attempt faced 7.1%
Rating, in goals
-6.1 Goals above replacement +0.2
-1.0 Wins above replacement +0.0
Contract
$875K Cap hit $800K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean