Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Brian Lashoff Keaton Ellerby

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerBrian Lashoff: Goals, 0.01 a game, 10th percentileBrian Lashoff: Assists, 0.07 a game, 3rd percentileBrian Lashoff: Points, 0.08 a game, 4th percentileBrian Lashoff: Shots, 0.51 a game, 3rd percentileBrian Lashoff: Hits, 0.87 a game, 29th percentileBrian Lashoff: Corsi for %, 50.4%, 53rd percentileBrian Lashoff: CF% rel, -1.0, 44th percentileBrian Lashoff: On-ice xG %, 49.6%, 46th percentileBrian Lashoff: Rating, -0.5 goals above replacement, 24th percentileBrian Lashoff: Chances created, 0.08 xG per 60, 5th percentileBrian Lashoff: Shot quality, 2.2% a shot, 9th percentileBrian Lashoff: Finishing, -1.4 goals above expected, 23rd percentileKeaton Ellerby: Goals, 0.04 a game, 35th percentileKeaton Ellerby: Assists, 0.08 a game, 6th percentileKeaton Ellerby: Points, 0.12 a game, 9th percentileKeaton Ellerby: Shots, 0.65 a game, 8th percentileKeaton Ellerby: Hits, 1.49 a game, 58th percentileKeaton Ellerby: Corsi for %, 47.8%, 27th percentileKeaton Ellerby: CF% rel, -2.6, 27th percentileKeaton Ellerby: On-ice xG %, 53.2%, 77th percentileKeaton Ellerby: Rating, +3.8 goals above replacement, 66th percentileKeaton Ellerby: Chances created, 0.10 xG per 60, 12th percentileKeaton Ellerby: Shot quality, 2.7% a shot, 26th percentileKeaton Ellerby: Finishing, +0.8 goals above expected, 70th percentile
0246204060Brian Lashoff 6Keaton Ellerby 6

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Brian Lashoff
Keaton Ellerby

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Brian Lashoff D, DET 2013-14 Keaton Ellerby D, WPG
75 Games played 51
1 Goals 2
5 Assists 4
6 Points 6
0.08 Points per game 0.12
-2 Plus/minus 4
38 Shots 33
2.6 Shooting % 6.1
65 Hits 76
36 Penalty minutes 2
14:26 Average ice time 13:55
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.4 Corsi for % 47.8
-1.0 CF% relative to team -2.6
50.8 Fenwick for % 47.9
49.6 Expected goals for % 53.2
-1.4 xGF% relative to team +2.7
49.3 Goals for % 53.5
100.0 PDO 101.2
95 Shot attempts taken 79
Expected goals, all situations
1.4 Expected goals 1.2
0.08 Expected goals per 60 0.10
2.2% Chance per attempt 2.7%
-1.4 Goals above expected +0.8
Rating, in goals
-0.5 Goals above replacement +3.8
-0.1 Wins above replacement +0.6
-2.9 Even-strength offence -1.9
+0.4 Even-strength defence +1.8
0.0 Power play +0.2
-0.4 Penalty kill -0.1
-1.2 Penalties +1.4
Contract
$725K Cap hit $735K
$121K Cap dollars per point $123K
$269K Worth at the going rate $2.7M
-$456K Value: worth minus cap hit +$2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean