Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Martin Jones Frederik Andersen

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerMartin Jones: Save %, 0.912, 35th percentileMartin Jones: Goals against, 2.34 a game, 62nd percentileMartin Jones: Workload, 26.5 shots a game, 22nd percentileMartin Jones: Games, 65 games, 91st percentileMartin Jones: Goals saved, +0.12 above expected per 60, 64th percentileFrederik Andersen: Save %, 0.918, 64th percentileFrederik Andersen: Goals against, 2.56 a game, 29th percentileFrederik Andersen: Workload, 31.1 shots a game, 87th percentileFrederik Andersen: Games, 66 games, 96th percentileFrederik Andersen: Goals saved, +0.27 above expected per 60, 80th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Martin Jones G, TOR 2016-17 Frederik Andersen G, CAR
65 Games played 66
35 Wins 33
23 Losses 16
2 Shutouts 4
1,725 Shots against 2,052
1,573 Saves 1,883
152 Goals against 169
0.912 Save % 0.918
2.40 Goals against average 2.67
Expected goals, while he was in net
159.9 Expected goals against 186.1
+7.9 Goals saved above expected +17.1
+0.12 Saved above expected per 60 +0.27
6.4% Chance per attempt faced 6.4%
Rating, in goals
+24.2 Goals above replacement +36.0
+4.0 Wins above replacement +6.0
Contract
$3M Cap hit $5M
$5.8M Worth at the going rate $8.4M
+$2.8M Value: worth minus cap hit +$3.4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean