Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Jordan Schroeder Riley Nash

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJordan Schroeder: Goals, 0.10 a game, 31st percentileJordan Schroeder: Assists, 0.19 a game, 46th percentileJordan Schroeder: Points, 0.29 a game, 36th percentileJordan Schroeder: Shots, 0.90 a game, 13th percentileJordan Schroeder: Hits, 0.32 a game, 6th percentileJordan Schroeder: Corsi for %, 51.9%, 69th percentileJordan Schroeder: CF% rel, -1.0, 41st percentileJordan Schroeder: On-ice xG %, 48.5%, 42nd percentileJordan Schroeder: Rating, -0.7 goals above replacement, 14th percentileJordan Schroeder: Chances created, 0.44 xG per 60, 8th percentileJordan Schroeder: Shot quality, 7.7% a shot, 60th percentileJordan Schroeder: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 52nd percentileRiley Nash: Goals, 0.13 a game, 37th percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.16 a game, 35th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.28 a game, 34th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.13 a game, 22nd percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 1.13 a game, 50th percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 51.7%, 68th percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, 0.7, 58th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 47.7%, 33rd percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +2.6 goals above replacement, 63rd percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.60 xG per 60, 33rd percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 7.9% a shot, 65th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 52nd percentile
0246820Jordan Schroeder 9Riley Nash 9

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Jordan Schroeder
Riley Nash

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Jordan Schroeder C, CBJ 2012-13 Riley Nash C, NYR
31 Games played 32
3 Goals 4
6 Assists 5
9 Points 9
0.29 Points per game 0.28
0 Plus/minus -4
28 Shots 36
10.7 Shooting % 11.1
10 Hits 36
4 Penalty minutes 8
13:43 Average ice time 12:48
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.9 Corsi for % 51.7
-1.0 CF% relative to team +0.7
51.5 Fenwick for % 50.3
48.5 Expected goals for % 47.7
-4.5 xGF% relative to team +0.1
50.0 Goals for % 42.9
99.6 PDO 98.0
41 Shot attempts taken 59
Expected goals, all situations
3.1 Expected goals 4.1
0.44 Expected goals per 60 0.60
7.7% Chance per attempt 7.9%
-0.1 Goals above expected -0.1
Rating, in goals
-0.7 Goals above replacement +2.6
-0.1 Wins above replacement +0.4
-0.7 Even-strength offence -0.1
-0.3 Even-strength defence +1.7
-0.7 Power play -0.3
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.1
-0.1 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$900K Cap hit $704K
$100K Cap dollars per point $78K
-$85K Worth at the going rate $2.8M
-$985K Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean