Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Tim Erixon Brian Lashoff

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTim Erixon: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileTim Erixon: Assists, 0.16 a game, 39th percentileTim Erixon: Points, 0.16 a game, 26th percentileTim Erixon: Shots, 0.68 a game, 13th percentileTim Erixon: Hits, 0.65 a game, 19th percentileTim Erixon: Corsi for %, 47.5%, 29th percentileTim Erixon: CF% rel, 0.7, 61st percentileTim Erixon: On-ice xG %, 45.7%, 17th percentileTim Erixon: Rating, -0.3 goals above replacement, 26th percentileTim Erixon: Chances created, 0.13 xG per 60, 28th percentileTim Erixon: Shot quality, 3.1% a shot, 46th percentileTim Erixon: Finishing, -1.0 goals above expected, 20th percentileBrian Lashoff: Goals, 0.03 a game, 36th percentileBrian Lashoff: Assists, 0.13 a game, 28th percentileBrian Lashoff: Points, 0.16 a game, 26th percentileBrian Lashoff: Shots, 0.84 a game, 26th percentileBrian Lashoff: Hits, 1.42 a game, 58th percentileBrian Lashoff: Corsi for %, 47.6%, 30th percentileBrian Lashoff: CF% rel, -7.5, 2nd percentileBrian Lashoff: On-ice xG %, 42.5%, 5th percentileBrian Lashoff: Rating, -3.4 goals above replacement, 2nd percentileBrian Lashoff: Chances created, 0.10 xG per 60, 13th percentileBrian Lashoff: Shot quality, 2.4% a shot, 16th percentileBrian Lashoff: Finishing, +0.1 goals above expected, 56th percentile
01234520Tim Erixon 5Brian Lashoff 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tim Erixon
Brian Lashoff

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tim Erixon D, TOR 2012-13 Brian Lashoff D, DET
31 Games played 31
0 Goals 1
5 Assists 4
5 Points 5
0.16 Points per game 0.16
4 Plus/minus -10
21 Shots 26
0.0 Shooting % 3.8
20 Hits 44
14 Penalty minutes 15
15:42 Average ice time 17:47
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.5 Corsi for % 47.6
+0.7 CF% relative to team -7.5
45.5 Fenwick for % 46.2
45.7 Expected goals for % 42.5
-0.3 xGF% relative to team -12.9
57.1 Goals for % 34.5
104.1 PDO 96.9
46 Shot attempts taken 44
Expected goals, all situations
1.0 Expected goals 0.9
0.13 Expected goals per 60 0.10
3.1% Chance per attempt 2.4%
-1.0 Goals above expected +0.1
Rating, in goals
-0.3 Goals above replacement -3.4
0.0 Wins above replacement -0.6
-1.1 Even-strength offence -2.0
-0.5 Even-strength defence -2.3
+0.1 Power play -0.1
+0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
-0.4 Penalties -0.7
Contract
$900K Cap hit $525K
$180K Cap dollars per point $105K
$291K Worth at the going rate -$2.4M
-$609K Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.9M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean