Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Landon Ferraro Austin Watson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerLandon Ferraro: Goals, 0.07 a game, 17th percentileLandon Ferraro: Assists, 0.07 a game, 11th percentileLandon Ferraro: Points, 0.15 a game, 12th percentileLandon Ferraro: Shots, 1.13 a game, 22nd percentileLandon Ferraro: Hits, 1.49 a game, 67th percentileLandon Ferraro: Corsi for %, 42.7%, 3rd percentileLandon Ferraro: CF% rel, -8.0, 2nd percentileLandon Ferraro: On-ice xG %, 44.7%, 13th percentileLandon Ferraro: Rating, +1.8 goals above replacement, 41st percentileLandon Ferraro: Chances created, 0.61 xG per 60, 31st percentileLandon Ferraro: Shot quality, 6.9% a shot, 29th percentileLandon Ferraro: Finishing, -2.4 goals above expected, 28th percentileAustin Watson: Goals, 0.05 a game, 11th percentileAustin Watson: Assists, 0.12 a game, 26th percentileAustin Watson: Points, 0.18 a game, 17th percentileAustin Watson: Shots, 0.96 a game, 15th percentileAustin Watson: Hits, 1.30 a game, 57th percentileAustin Watson: Corsi for %, 45.3%, 10th percentileAustin Watson: CF% rel, -8.9, 1st percentileAustin Watson: On-ice xG %, 46.2%, 22nd percentileAustin Watson: Rating, +0.5 goals above replacement, 28th percentileAustin Watson: Chances created, 0.41 xG per 60, 4th percentileAustin Watson: Shot quality, 5.6% a shot, 4th percentileAustin Watson: Finishing, -1.9 goals above expected, 33rd percentile
0246810204060Landon Ferraro 10Austin Watson 10

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Landon Ferraro
Austin Watson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Landon Ferraro C, MIN 2015-16 Austin Watson L, DET
68 Games played 57
5 Goals 3
5 Assists 7
10 Points 10
0.15 Points per game 0.18
-11 Plus/minus -4
77 Shots 55
6.5 Shooting % 5.5
101 Hits 74
27 Penalty minutes 32
10:37 Average ice time 10:00
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
42.7 Corsi for % 45.3
-8.0 CF% relative to team -8.9
43.3 Fenwick for % 47.8
44.7 Expected goals for % 46.2
-3.3 xGF% relative to team -9.1
38.5 Goals for % 38.2
98.3 PDO 96.4
123 Shot attempts taken 88
Expected goals, all situations
7.4 Expected goals 3.9
0.61 Expected goals per 60 0.41
6.9% Chance per attempt 5.6%
-2.4 Goals above expected -1.9
Rating, in goals
+1.8 Goals above replacement +0.5
+0.3 Wins above replacement +0.1
-2.0 Even-strength offence -3.2
+0.8 Even-strength defence +2.6
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.4 Penalty kill +0.4
+0.6 Penalties -0.8
Contract
$600K Cap hit $575K
$60K Cap dollars per point $58K
$1.7M Worth at the going rate $898K
+$1.1M Value: worth minus cap hit +$323K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean