Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Anton Lander Kevin Porter

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerAnton Lander: Goals, 0.02 a game, 3rd percentileAnton Lander: Assists, 0.03 a game, 2nd percentileAnton Lander: Points, 0.05 a game, 1st percentileAnton Lander: Shots, 0.89 a game, 11th percentileAnton Lander: Hits, 0.95 a game, 40th percentileAnton Lander: Corsi for %, 47.3%, 24th percentileAnton Lander: CF% rel, -2.8, 19th percentileAnton Lander: On-ice xG %, 45.3%, 16th percentileAnton Lander: Rating, -1.8 goals above replacement, 9th percentileAnton Lander: Chances created, 0.36 xG per 60, 2nd percentileAnton Lander: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 18th percentileAnton Lander: Finishing, -3.5 goals above expected, 20th percentileKevin Porter: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileKevin Porter: Assists, 0.07 a game, 11th percentileKevin Porter: Points, 0.07 a game, 3rd percentileKevin Porter: Shots, 0.83 a game, 8th percentileKevin Porter: Hits, 2.34 a game, 90th percentileKevin Porter: Corsi for %, 48.7%, 35th percentileKevin Porter: CF% rel, -5.3, 8th percentileKevin Porter: On-ice xG %, 51.5%, 61st percentileKevin Porter: Rating, +0.9 goals above replacement, 31st percentileKevin Porter: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 11th percentileKevin Porter: Shot quality, 8.1% a shot, 69th percentileKevin Porter: Finishing, -3.7 goals above expected, 19th percentile
0123204060Anton Lander 3Kevin Porter 3

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Anton Lander
Kevin Porter

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Anton Lander C, EDM 2015-16 Kevin Porter C, PIT
61 Games played 41
1 Goals 0
2 Assists 3
3 Points 3
0.05 Points per game 0.07
-9 Plus/minus -2
54 Shots 34
1.9 Shooting % 0.0
58 Hits 96
18 Penalty minutes 0
12:05 Average ice time 11:19
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.3 Corsi for % 48.7
-2.8 CF% relative to team -5.3
46.1 Fenwick for % 49.4
45.3 Expected goals for % 51.5
-3.9 xGF% relative to team -6.1
29.6 Goals for % 37.5
96.4 PDO 98.0
78 Shot attempts taken 52
Expected goals, all situations
4.5 Expected goals 3.7
0.36 Expected goals per 60 0.48
6.4% Chance per attempt 8.1%
-3.5 Goals above expected -3.7
Rating, in goals
-1.8 Goals above replacement +0.9
-0.3 Wins above replacement +0.1
-4.2 Even-strength offence -3.0
+0.7 Even-strength defence +1.4
-0.7 Power play 0.0
-0.7 Penalty kill +0.5
+1.1 Penalties +0.7
Contract
$988K Cap hit $575K
$329K Cap dollars per point $192K
-$590K Worth at the going rate $1.1M
-$1.6M Value: worth minus cap hit +$547K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean