Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Anton Lander Mattias Tedenby

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerAnton Lander: Goals, 0.04 a game, 8th percentileAnton Lander: Assists, 0.07 a game, 11th percentileAnton Lander: Points, 0.11 a game, 10th percentileAnton Lander: Shots, 0.96 a game, 18th percentileAnton Lander: Hits, 0.57 a game, 20th percentileAnton Lander: Corsi for %, 43.1%, 4th percentileAnton Lander: CF% rel, -5.0, 10th percentileAnton Lander: On-ice xG %, 42.3%, 4th percentileAnton Lander: Rating, -1.6 goals above replacement, 9th percentileAnton Lander: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 11th percentileAnton Lander: Shot quality, 7.1% a shot, 38th percentileAnton Lander: Finishing, -2.8 goals above expected, 25th percentileMattias Tedenby: Goals, 0.02 a game, 5th percentileMattias Tedenby: Assists, 0.12 a game, 26th percentileMattias Tedenby: Points, 0.14 a game, 14th percentileMattias Tedenby: Shots, 1.07 a game, 21st percentileMattias Tedenby: Hits, 0.58 a game, 20th percentileMattias Tedenby: Corsi for %, 47.1%, 24th percentileMattias Tedenby: CF% rel, -2.8, 22nd percentileMattias Tedenby: On-ice xG %, 45.6%, 16th percentileMattias Tedenby: Rating, -0.7 goals above replacement, 17th percentileMattias Tedenby: Chances created, 0.49 xG per 60, 12th percentileMattias Tedenby: Shot quality, 7.1% a shot, 38th percentileMattias Tedenby: Finishing, -2.7 goals above expected, 27th percentile
02462040Anton Lander 6Mattias Tedenby 6

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Anton Lander
Mattias Tedenby

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Anton Lander C, EDM 2011-12 Mattias Tedenby R, NJD
56 Games played 43
2 Goals 1
4 Assists 5
6 Points 6
0.11 Points per game 0.14
-8 Plus/minus -15
54 Shots 46
3.7 Shooting % 2.2
32 Hits 25
12 Penalty minutes 16
10:37 Average ice time 10:45
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
43.1 Corsi for % 47.1
-5.0 CF% relative to team -2.8
44.0 Fenwick for % 45.5
42.3 Expected goals for % 45.6
-3.7 xGF% relative to team -6.6
35.7 Goals for % 31.3
97.4 PDO 94.3
76 Shot attempts taken 70
Expected goals, all situations
4.8 Expected goals 3.7
0.48 Expected goals per 60 0.49
7.1% Chance per attempt 7.1%
-2.8 Goals above expected -2.7
Rating, in goals
-1.6 Goals above replacement -0.7
-0.3 Wins above replacement -0.1
-3.4 Even-strength offence -1.8
+0.3 Even-strength defence -0.9
-0.1 Power play -0.2
-0.1 Penalty kill -0.1
+0.1 Penalties +1.1

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean