Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Peter Holland Riley Nash

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerPeter Holland: Goals, 0.18 a game, 53rd percentilePeter Holland: Assists, 0.23 a game, 48th percentilePeter Holland: Points, 0.40 a game, 48th percentilePeter Holland: Shots, 1.50 a game, 41st percentilePeter Holland: Hits, 1.60 a game, 66th percentilePeter Holland: Corsi for %, 43.9%, 12th percentilePeter Holland: CF% rel, -2.7, 21st percentilePeter Holland: On-ice xG %, 39.3%, 3rd percentilePeter Holland: Rating, +0.8 goals above replacement, 30th percentilePeter Holland: Chances created, 0.50 xG per 60, 16th percentilePeter Holland: Shot quality, 6.2% a shot, 13th percentilePeter Holland: Finishing, +3.5 goals above expected, 82nd percentileRiley Nash: Goals, 0.12 a game, 30th percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.25 a game, 54th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.37 a game, 42nd percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.38 a game, 35th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 1.29 a game, 53rd percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 52.9%, 71st percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, 1.1, 58th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 53.2%, 69th percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +7.7 goals above replacement, 81st percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.72 xG per 60, 51st percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 10.7% a shot, 99th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -5.3 goals above expected, 6th percentile
0510152025204060Peter Holland 25Riley Nash 25

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Peter Holland
Riley Nash

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Peter Holland C, NYR 2014-15 Riley Nash C, NYR
62 Games played 68
11 Goals 8
14 Assists 17
25 Points 25
0.40 Points per game 0.37
0 Plus/minus -10
93 Shots 94
11.8 Shooting % 8.5
99 Hits 88
31 Penalty minutes 12
14:31 Average ice time 16:19
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
43.9 Corsi for % 52.9
-2.7 CF% relative to team +1.1
43.0 Fenwick for % 52.0
39.3 Expected goals for % 53.2
-5.7 xGF% relative to team +2.7
51.7 Goals for % 44.8
102.3 PDO 97.7
125 Shot attempts taken 126
Expected goals, all situations
7.5 Expected goals 13.3
0.50 Expected goals per 60 0.72
6.2% Chance per attempt 10.7%
+3.5 Goals above expected -5.3
Rating, in goals
+0.8 Goals above replacement +7.7
+0.1 Wins above replacement +1.3
-1.5 Even-strength offence -0.1
+1.2 Even-strength defence +3.6
-0.6 Power play 0.0
-0.6 Penalty kill +0.7
-0.2 Penalties +0.5
Contract
$775K Cap hit $575K
$31K Cap dollars per point $23K
$1.1M Worth at the going rate $5.2M
+$277K Value: worth minus cap hit +$4.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean