Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

David Rundblad Ben Lovejoy

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDavid Rundblad: Goals, 0.06 a game, 58th percentileDavid Rundblad: Assists, 0.22 a game, 59th percentileDavid Rundblad: Points, 0.29 a game, 58th percentileDavid Rundblad: Shots, 1.18 a game, 48th percentileDavid Rundblad: Hits, 0.47 a game, 6th percentileDavid Rundblad: Corsi for %, 57.0%, 99th percentileDavid Rundblad: CF% rel, 4.2, 90th percentileDavid Rundblad: On-ice xG %, 53.2%, 74th percentileDavid Rundblad: Rating, +3.1 goals above replacement, 59th percentileDavid Rundblad: Chances created, 0.18 xG per 60, 50th percentileDavid Rundblad: Shot quality, 2.3% a shot, 8th percentileDavid Rundblad: Finishing, +1.1 goals above expected, 71st percentileBen Lovejoy: Goals, 0.03 a game, 29th percentileBen Lovejoy: Assists, 0.20 a game, 55th percentileBen Lovejoy: Points, 0.23 a game, 45th percentileBen Lovejoy: Shots, 1.43 a game, 62nd percentileBen Lovejoy: Hits, 2.83 a game, 93rd percentileBen Lovejoy: Corsi for %, 52.3%, 71st percentileBen Lovejoy: CF% rel, 0.0, 52nd percentileBen Lovejoy: On-ice xG %, 53.5%, 77th percentileBen Lovejoy: Rating, +2.0 goals above replacement, 50th percentileBen Lovejoy: Chances created, 0.17 xG per 60, 47th percentileBen Lovejoy: Shot quality, 2.7% a shot, 26th percentileBen Lovejoy: Finishing, -1.3 goals above expected, 22nd percentile
0510204060David Rundblad 14Ben Lovejoy 14

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

David Rundblad
Ben Lovejoy

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

David Rundblad D, CHI 2014-15 Ben Lovejoy D, DAL
49 Games played 60
3 Goals 2
11 Assists 12
14 Points 14
0.29 Points per game 0.23
17 Plus/minus -4
58 Shots 86
5.2 Shooting % 2.3
23 Hits 170
12 Penalty minutes 25
12:48 Average ice time 19:26
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
57.0 Corsi for % 52.3
+4.2 CF% relative to team +0.0
55.0 Fenwick for % 53.5
53.2 Expected goals for % 53.5
+2.0 xGF% relative to team +0.6
67.4 Goals for % 46.8
104.4 PDO 98.7
128 Shot attempts taken 153
Expected goals, all situations
1.9 Expected goals 3.3
0.18 Expected goals per 60 0.17
2.3% Chance per attempt 2.7%
+1.1 Goals above expected -1.3
Rating, in goals
+3.1 Goals above replacement +2.0
+0.5 Wins above replacement +0.3
+1.1 Even-strength offence -1.0
+0.3 Even-strength defence +0.9
-0.1 Power play -0.2
0.0 Penalty kill -0.6
-0.3 Penalties -1.0
Contract
$785K Cap hit $1.1M
$56K Cap dollars per point $79K
$2.4M Worth at the going rate $1.8M
+$1.6M Value: worth minus cap hit +$665K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean