Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Tomas Tatar Colin Fraser

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTomas Tatar: Goals, 0.22 a game, 68th percentileTomas Tatar: Assists, 0.17 a game, 37th percentileTomas Tatar: Points, 0.39 a game, 51st percentileTomas Tatar: Shots, 1.78 a game, 57th percentileTomas Tatar: Hits, 0.50 a game, 16th percentileTomas Tatar: Corsi for %, 60.6%, 99th percentileTomas Tatar: CF% rel, 11.7, 99th percentileTomas Tatar: On-ice xG %, 59.2%, 95th percentileTomas Tatar: Rating, +2.5 goals above replacement, 60th percentileTomas Tatar: Chances created, 1.03 xG per 60, 92nd percentileTomas Tatar: Shot quality, 8.2% a shot, 76th percentileTomas Tatar: Finishing, +0.5 goals above expected, 57th percentileColin Fraser: Goals, 0.06 a game, 14th percentileColin Fraser: Assists, 0.15 a game, 32nd percentileColin Fraser: Points, 0.21 a game, 21st percentileColin Fraser: Shots, 0.56 a game, 5th percentileColin Fraser: Hits, 2.09 a game, 84th percentileColin Fraser: Corsi for %, 50.9%, 60th percentileColin Fraser: CF% rel, -7.6, 5th percentileColin Fraser: On-ice xG %, 49.2%, 46th percentileColin Fraser: Rating, +0.0 goals above replacement, 23rd percentileColin Fraser: Chances created, 0.49 xG per 60, 14th percentileColin Fraser: Shot quality, 9.7% a shot, 96th percentileColin Fraser: Finishing, -0.6 goals above expected, 45th percentile
024620Tomas Tatar 7Colin Fraser 7

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tomas Tatar
Colin Fraser

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tomas Tatar L, NJD 2012-13 Colin Fraser C, STL
18 Games played 34
4 Goals 2
3 Assists 5
7 Points 7
0.39 Points per game 0.21
2 Plus/minus -4
32 Shots 19
12.5 Shooting % 10.5
9 Hits 71
4 Penalty minutes 25
11:22 Average ice time 9:22
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
60.6 Corsi for % 50.9
+11.7 CF% relative to team -7.6
60.0 Fenwick for % 46.5
59.2 Expected goals for % 49.2
+10.1 xGF% relative to team -10.4
61.5 Goals for % 40.9
101.3 PDO 97.4
45 Shot attempts taken 38
Expected goals, all situations
3.5 Expected goals 2.6
1.03 Expected goals per 60 0.49
8.2% Chance per attempt 9.7%
+0.5 Goals above expected -0.6
Rating, in goals
+2.5 Goals above replacement +0.0
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.0
+0.4 Even-strength offence -0.8
+1.0 Even-strength defence -0.1
0.0 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.5 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$630K Cap hit $825K
$90K Cap dollars per point $118K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean