Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Tomas Tatar Blake Comeau

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTomas Tatar: Goals, 0.24 a game, 70th percentileTomas Tatar: Assists, 0.17 a game, 33rd percentileTomas Tatar: Points, 0.41 a game, 49th percentileTomas Tatar: Shots, 2.12 a game, 71st percentileTomas Tatar: Hits, 0.82 a game, 40th percentileTomas Tatar: Corsi for %, 49.8%, 46th percentileTomas Tatar: CF% rel, 1.3, 62nd percentileTomas Tatar: On-ice xG %, 48.0%, 32nd percentileTomas Tatar: Rating, +1.9 goals above replacement, 42nd percentileTomas Tatar: Chances created, 0.74 xG per 60, 49th percentileTomas Tatar: Shot quality, 6.6% a shot, 22nd percentileTomas Tatar: Finishing, +3.5 goals above expected, 78th percentileBlake Comeau: Goals, 0.16 a game, 44th percentileBlake Comeau: Assists, 0.27 a game, 57th percentileBlake Comeau: Points, 0.43 a game, 54th percentileBlake Comeau: Shots, 1.56 a game, 42nd percentileBlake Comeau: Hits, 1.84 a game, 84th percentileBlake Comeau: Corsi for %, 47.4%, 21st percentileBlake Comeau: CF% rel, -0.6, 42nd percentileBlake Comeau: On-ice xG %, 45.5%, 16th percentileBlake Comeau: Rating, +2.3 goals above replacement, 47th percentileBlake Comeau: Chances created, 0.46 xG per 60, 4th percentileBlake Comeau: Shot quality, 5.8% a shot, 4th percentileBlake Comeau: Finishing, +2.5 goals above expected, 71st percentile
010203020406080Tomas Tatar 34Blake Comeau 34

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tomas Tatar
Blake Comeau

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tomas Tatar L, NJD 2017-18 Blake Comeau L, DAL
82 Games played 79
20 Goals 13
14 Assists 21
34 Points 34
0.41 Points per game 0.43
-19 Plus/minus 5
174 Shots 123
11.5 Shooting % 10.6
67 Hits 145
34 Penalty minutes 50
16:16 Average ice time 15:52
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.8 Corsi for % 47.4
+1.3 CF% relative to team -0.6
50.3 Fenwick for % 46.9
48.0 Expected goals for % 45.5
+0.8 xGF% relative to team -2.0
44.2 Goals for % 49.3
98.3 PDO 100.5
219 Shot attempts taken 197
Expected goals, all situations
16.5 Expected goals 9.5
0.74 Expected goals per 60 0.46
6.6% Chance per attempt 5.8%
+3.5 Goals above expected +2.5
Rating, in goals
+1.9 Goals above replacement +2.3
+0.3 Wins above replacement +0.4
-2.6 Even-strength offence -1.4
-0.9 Even-strength defence +1.3
+0.0 Power play -0.1
+0.1 Penalty kill -0.7
+1.6 Penalties -0.3
Contract
$5.3M Cap hit $2.4M
$156K Cap dollars per point $71K
$1.8M Worth at the going rate $2M
-$3.5M Value: worth minus cap hit -$353K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean