Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Anders Nilsson Scott Darling

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerAnders Nilsson: Save %, 0.901, 8th percentileAnders Nilsson: Goals against, 2.69 a game, 5th percentileAnders Nilsson: Workload, 27.2 shots a game, 48th percentileAnders Nilsson: Games, 29 games, 29th percentileAnders Nilsson: Goals saved, -0.29 above expected per 60, 14th percentileScott Darling: Save %, 0.915, 40th percentileScott Darling: Goals against, 2.31 a game, 55th percentileScott Darling: Workload, 27.0 shots a game, 47th percentileScott Darling: Games, 29 games, 29th percentileScott Darling: Goals saved, -0.10 above expected per 60, 30th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Anders Nilsson G, OTT 2015-16 Scott Darling G, CAR
29 Games played 29
10 Wins 12
13 Losses 8
0 Shutouts 1
789 Shots against 784
711 Saves 717
78 Goals against 67
0.901 Save % 0.915
3.12 Goals against average 2.58
Expected goals, while he was in net
70.8 Expected goals against 64.3
-7.2 Goals saved above expected -2.7
-0.29 Saved above expected per 60 -0.10
6.5% Chance per attempt faced 6.0%
Rating, in goals
+0.1 Goals above replacement +3.9
+0.0 Wins above replacement +0.6
Contract
$1M Cap hit $588K
$588K Worth at the going rate $1.5M
-$412K Value: worth minus cap hit +$918K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean