Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Craig Smith Erik Condra

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerCraig Smith: Goals, 0.09 a game, 29th percentileCraig Smith: Assists, 0.18 a game, 42nd percentileCraig Smith: Points, 0.27 a game, 32nd percentileCraig Smith: Shots, 1.89 a game, 62nd percentileCraig Smith: Hits, 0.89 a game, 36th percentileCraig Smith: Corsi for %, 44.9%, 13th percentileCraig Smith: CF% rel, -1.9, 31st percentileCraig Smith: On-ice xG %, 52.2%, 70th percentileCraig Smith: Rating, +1.0 goals above replacement, 38th percentileCraig Smith: Chances created, 0.75 xG per 60, 60th percentileCraig Smith: Shot quality, 7.2% a shot, 43rd percentileCraig Smith: Finishing, -3.7 goals above expected, 8th percentileErik Condra: Goals, 0.08 a game, 23rd percentileErik Condra: Assists, 0.17 a game, 37th percentileErik Condra: Points, 0.25 a game, 28th percentileErik Condra: Shots, 1.52 a game, 44th percentileErik Condra: Hits, 0.25 a game, 3rd percentileErik Condra: Corsi for %, 55.7%, 90th percentileErik Condra: CF% rel, 2.6, 75th percentileErik Condra: On-ice xG %, 58.7%, 94th percentileErik Condra: Rating, +3.7 goals above replacement, 72nd percentileErik Condra: Chances created, 0.72 xG per 60, 54th percentileErik Condra: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 48th percentileErik Condra: Finishing, -3.6 goals above expected, 10th percentile
05102040Craig Smith 12Erik Condra 12

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Craig Smith
Erik Condra

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Craig Smith C, DET 2012-13 Erik Condra R, DAL
44 Games played 48
4 Goals 4
8 Assists 8
12 Points 12
0.27 Points per game 0.25
-11 Plus/minus 3
83 Shots 73
4.8 Shooting % 5.5
39 Hits 12
20 Penalty minutes 34
13:51 Average ice time 13:10
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.9 Corsi for % 55.7
-1.9 CF% relative to team +2.6
45.8 Fenwick for % 55.4
52.2 Expected goals for % 58.7
+3.9 xGF% relative to team +7.6
38.7 Goals for % 48.4
97.3 PDO 98.3
112 Shot attempts taken 115
Expected goals, all situations
7.7 Expected goals 7.6
0.75 Expected goals per 60 0.72
7.2% Chance per attempt 7.4%
-3.7 Goals above expected -3.6
Rating, in goals
+1.0 Goals above replacement +3.7
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.6
-0.8 Even-strength offence +0.5
+0.4 Even-strength defence +2.5
+0.2 Power play +0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill -0.6
-0.4 Penalties -0.4
Contract
$715K Cap hit $625K
$60K Cap dollars per point $52K
$1.4M Worth at the going rate $3.7M
+$717K Value: worth minus cap hit +$3.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean