Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Michael Latta Tanner Glass

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMichael Latta: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileMichael Latta: Assists, 0.11 a game, 22nd percentileMichael Latta: Points, 0.11 a game, 5th percentileMichael Latta: Shots, 0.45 a game, 1st percentileMichael Latta: Hits, 1.72 a game, 72nd percentileMichael Latta: Corsi for %, 50.9%, 54th percentileMichael Latta: CF% rel, 0.1, 48th percentileMichael Latta: On-ice xG %, 56.1%, 88th percentileMichael Latta: Rating, +1.1 goals above replacement, 33rd percentileMichael Latta: Chances created, 0.24 xG per 60, 1st percentileMichael Latta: Shot quality, 5.0% a shot, 1st percentileMichael Latta: Finishing, -1.7 goals above expected, 37th percentileTanner Glass: Goals, 0.02 a game, 2nd percentileTanner Glass: Assists, 0.08 a game, 9th percentileTanner Glass: Points, 0.09 a game, 3rd percentileTanner Glass: Shots, 0.80 a game, 6th percentileTanner Glass: Hits, 3.23 a game, 96th percentileTanner Glass: Corsi for %, 43.5%, 10th percentileTanner Glass: CF% rel, -7.8, 4th percentileTanner Glass: On-ice xG %, 42.6%, 9th percentileTanner Glass: Rating, -4.4 goals above replacement, 1st percentileTanner Glass: Chances created, 0.36 xG per 60, 2nd percentileTanner Glass: Shot quality, 5.7% a shot, 4th percentileTanner Glass: Finishing, -3.0 goals above expected, 20th percentile
0246204060Michael Latta 6Tanner Glass 6

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Michael Latta
Tanner Glass

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Michael Latta C, WSH 2014-15 Tanner Glass L, CGY
53 Games played 66
0 Goals 1
6 Assists 5
6 Points 6
0.11 Points per game 0.09
4 Plus/minus -12
24 Shots 53
0.0 Shooting % 1.9
91 Hits 213
68 Penalty minutes 98
8:23 Average ice time 10:15
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.9 Corsi for % 43.5
+0.1 CF% relative to team -7.8
53.0 Fenwick for % 42.6
56.1 Expected goals for % 42.6
+3.3 xGF% relative to team -8.1
60.0 Goals for % 33.3
101.7 PDO 96.8
51 Shot attempts taken 81
Expected goals, all situations
1.7 Expected goals 4.0
0.24 Expected goals per 60 0.36
5.0% Chance per attempt 5.7%
-1.7 Goals above expected -3.0
Rating, in goals
+1.1 Goals above replacement -4.4
+0.2 Wins above replacement -0.7
-1.9 Even-strength offence -4.3
+1.8 Even-strength defence -1.0
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.1 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.1 Penalties -0.9
Contract
$575K Cap hit $1.45M
$96K Cap dollars per point $242K
$1.2M Worth at the going rate -$2.1M
+$635K Value: worth minus cap hit -$3.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean