Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Matt Hackett Andrew Raycroft

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerMatt Hackett: Save %, 0.922, 84th percentileMatt Hackett: Goals against, 1.83 a game, 96th percentileMatt Hackett: Workload, 23.5 shots a game, 2nd percentileMatt Hackett: Games, 12 games, 1st percentileMatt Hackett: Goals saved, +0.30 above expected per 60, 85th percentileAndrew Raycroft: Save %, 0.898, 6th percentileAndrew Raycroft: Goals against, 3.10 a game, 4th percentileAndrew Raycroft: Workload, 30.3 shots a game, 94th percentileAndrew Raycroft: Games, 10 games, 1st percentileAndrew Raycroft: Goals saved, -0.92 above expected per 60, 2nd percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 50 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Matt Hackett G, BUF 2011-12 Andrew Raycroft G, DAL
12 Games played 10
3 Wins 2
6 Losses 8
0 Shutouts 0
282 Shots against 303
260 Saves 272
22 Goals against 31
0.922 Save % 0.898
2.38 Goals against average 3.51
Expected goals, while he was in net
24.8 Expected goals against 22.9
+2.8 Goals saved above expected -8.1
+0.30 Saved above expected per 60 -0.92
5.8% Chance per attempt faced 5.6%
Rating, in goals
+5.3 Goals above replacement -5.8
+0.9 Wins above replacement -1.0

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean