Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Seth Helgeson Nikita Nikitin

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerSeth Helgeson: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileSeth Helgeson: Assists, 0.05 a game, 6th percentileSeth Helgeson: Points, 0.05 a game, 4th percentileSeth Helgeson: Shots, 0.47 a game, 3rd percentileSeth Helgeson: Hits, 2.42 a game, 92nd percentileSeth Helgeson: Corsi for %, 41.6%, 1st percentileSeth Helgeson: CF% rel, -2.7, 26th percentileSeth Helgeson: On-ice xG %, 42.2%, 2nd percentileSeth Helgeson: Rating, -1.1 goals above replacement, 19th percentileSeth Helgeson: Chances created, 0.09 xG per 60, 10th percentileSeth Helgeson: Shot quality, 2.3% a shot, 9th percentileSeth Helgeson: Finishing, -0.4 goals above expected, 45th percentileNikita Nikitin: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileNikita Nikitin: Assists, 0.09 a game, 13th percentileNikita Nikitin: Points, 0.09 a game, 7th percentileNikita Nikitin: Shots, 1.09 a game, 40th percentileNikita Nikitin: Hits, 1.27 a game, 53rd percentileNikita Nikitin: Corsi for %, 53.1%, 84th percentileNikita Nikitin: CF% rel, 3.1, 84th percentileNikita Nikitin: On-ice xG %, 50.6%, 59th percentileNikita Nikitin: Rating, -0.8 goals above replacement, 21st percentileNikita Nikitin: Chances created, 0.14 xG per 60, 30th percentileNikita Nikitin: Shot quality, 2.1% a shot, 4th percentileNikita Nikitin: Finishing, -0.4 goals above expected, 45th percentile
00.20.40.60.81Seth Helgeson 1Nikita Nikitin 1

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Seth Helgeson
Nikita Nikitin

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Seth Helgeson D, NJD 2015-16 Nikita Nikitin D, EDM
19 Games played 11
0 Goals 0
1 Assists 1
1 Points 1
0.05 Points per game 0.09
-5 Plus/minus -5
9 Shots 12
0.0 Shooting % 0.0
46 Hits 14
17 Penalty minutes 8
13:57 Average ice time 14:48
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
41.6 Corsi for % 53.1
-2.7 CF% relative to team +3.1
42.7 Fenwick for % 52.1
42.2 Expected goals for % 50.6
-3.8 xGF% relative to team +1.0
22.2 Goals for % 33.3
96.7 PDO 93.9
20 Shot attempts taken 32
Expected goals, all situations
0.4 Expected goals 0.4
0.09 Expected goals per 60 0.14
2.3% Chance per attempt 2.1%
-0.4 Goals above expected -0.4
Rating, in goals
-1.1 Goals above replacement -0.8
-0.2 Wins above replacement -0.1
-0.6 Even-strength offence -0.1
-0.8 Even-strength defence -0.9
0.0 Power play -0.1
+0.1 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.6 Penalties -0.3
Contract
$588K Cap hit $4.5M
$588K Cap dollars per point $4.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean