Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Seth Helgeson Brandon Gormley

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerSeth Helgeson: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileSeth Helgeson: Assists, 0.05 a game, 6th percentileSeth Helgeson: Points, 0.05 a game, 4th percentileSeth Helgeson: Shots, 0.47 a game, 3rd percentileSeth Helgeson: Hits, 2.42 a game, 92nd percentileSeth Helgeson: Corsi for %, 41.6%, 1st percentileSeth Helgeson: CF% rel, -2.7, 26th percentileSeth Helgeson: On-ice xG %, 42.2%, 2nd percentileSeth Helgeson: Rating, -1.1 goals above replacement, 19th percentileSeth Helgeson: Chances created, 0.09 xG per 60, 10th percentileSeth Helgeson: Shot quality, 2.3% a shot, 9th percentileSeth Helgeson: Finishing, -0.4 goals above expected, 45th percentileBrandon Gormley: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileBrandon Gormley: Assists, 0.04 a game, 4th percentileBrandon Gormley: Points, 0.04 a game, 2nd percentileBrandon Gormley: Shots, 0.42 a game, 2nd percentileBrandon Gormley: Hits, 0.69 a game, 18th percentileBrandon Gormley: Corsi for %, 45.8%, 13th percentileBrandon Gormley: CF% rel, 1.4, 71st percentileBrandon Gormley: On-ice xG %, 45.7%, 15th percentileBrandon Gormley: Rating, -0.1 goals above replacement, 28th percentileBrandon Gormley: Chances created, 0.09 xG per 60, 8th percentileBrandon Gormley: Shot quality, 2.2% a shot, 5th percentileBrandon Gormley: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 44th percentile
00.20.40.60.8120Seth Helgeson 1Brandon Gormley 1

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Seth Helgeson
Brandon Gormley

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Seth Helgeson D, NJD 2015-16 Brandon Gormley D, COL
19 Games played 26
0 Goals 0
1 Assists 1
1 Points 1
0.05 Points per game 0.04
-5 Plus/minus -3
9 Shots 11
0.0 Shooting % 0.0
46 Hits 18
17 Penalty minutes 8
13:57 Average ice time 12:11
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
41.6 Corsi for % 45.8
-2.7 CF% relative to team +1.4
42.7 Fenwick for % 46.8
42.2 Expected goals for % 45.7
-3.8 xGF% relative to team +1.0
22.2 Goals for % 44.8
96.7 PDO 98.6
20 Shot attempts taken 32
Expected goals, all situations
0.4 Expected goals 0.5
0.09 Expected goals per 60 0.09
2.3% Chance per attempt 2.2%
-0.4 Goals above expected -0.5
Rating, in goals
-1.1 Goals above replacement -0.1
-0.2 Wins above replacement 0.0
-0.6 Even-strength offence -1.1
-0.8 Even-strength defence +0.5
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.1 Penalty kill -0.1
-0.6 Penalties -0.5
Contract
$588K Cap hit $850K
$588K Cap dollars per point $850K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean