Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Ben Chiarot Brandon Manning

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerBen Chiarot: Goals, 0.03 a game, 28th percentileBen Chiarot: Assists, 0.17 a game, 39th percentileBen Chiarot: Points, 0.20 a game, 35th percentileBen Chiarot: Shots, 0.83 a game, 11th percentileBen Chiarot: Hits, 1.32 a game, 55th percentileBen Chiarot: Corsi for %, 45.0%, 5th percentileBen Chiarot: CF% rel, -5.9, 3rd percentileBen Chiarot: On-ice xG %, 46.7%, 21st percentileBen Chiarot: Rating, -1.0 goals above replacement, 19th percentileBen Chiarot: Chances created, 0.14 xG per 60, 25th percentileBen Chiarot: Shot quality, 3.5% a shot, 76th percentileBen Chiarot: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 51st percentileBrandon Manning: Goals, 0.05 a game, 42nd percentileBrandon Manning: Assists, 0.14 a game, 28th percentileBrandon Manning: Points, 0.18 a game, 30th percentileBrandon Manning: Shots, 1.29 a game, 53rd percentileBrandon Manning: Hits, 1.86 a game, 78th percentileBrandon Manning: Corsi for %, 51.7%, 75th percentileBrandon Manning: CF% rel, 1.1, 67th percentileBrandon Manning: On-ice xG %, 46.9%, 23rd percentileBrandon Manning: Rating, -0.4 goals above replacement, 27th percentileBrandon Manning: Chances created, 0.17 xG per 60, 43rd percentileBrandon Manning: Shot quality, 2.9% a shot, 41st percentileBrandon Manning: Finishing, -1.4 goals above expected, 24th percentile
0510204060Ben Chiarot 12Brandon Manning 12

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Ben Chiarot
Brandon Manning

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Ben Chiarot D, DET 2016-17 Brandon Manning D, EDM
59 Games played 65
2 Goals 3
10 Assists 9
12 Points 12
0.20 Points per game 0.18
2 Plus/minus -12
49 Shots 84
4.1 Shooting % 3.6
78 Hits 121
33 Penalty minutes 83
15:19 Average ice time 18:03
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.0 Corsi for % 51.7
-5.9 CF% relative to team +1.1
44.4 Fenwick for % 50.7
46.7 Expected goals for % 46.9
-5.2 xGF% relative to team -3.1
46.7 Goals for % 41.3
100.9 PDO 97.5
97 Shot attempts taken 181
Expected goals, all situations
2.1 Expected goals 3.4
0.14 Expected goals per 60 0.17
3.5% Chance per attempt 2.9%
-0.1 Goals above expected -1.4
Rating, in goals
-1.0 Goals above replacement -0.4
-0.2 Wins above replacement -0.1
-2.1 Even-strength offence -1.4
-0.4 Even-strength defence -2.9
0.0 Power play -0.2
+0.2 Penalty kill +0.7
-1.7 Penalties -0.5
Contract
$850K Cap hit $975K
$71K Cap dollars per point $81K
-$44K Worth at the going rate $302K
-$894K Value: worth minus cap hit -$673K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean