Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Anders Lee David Krejci

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerAnders Lee: Goals, 0.29 a game, 77th percentileAnders Lee: Assists, 0.34 a game, 72nd percentileAnders Lee: Points, 0.63 a game, 74th percentileAnders Lee: Shots, 2.87 a game, 90th percentileAnders Lee: Hits, 1.50 a game, 73rd percentileAnders Lee: Corsi for %, 51.4%, 62nd percentileAnders Lee: CF% rel, 7.2, 97th percentileAnders Lee: On-ice xG %, 54.1%, 80th percentileAnders Lee: Rating, +6.5 goals above replacement, 79th percentileAnders Lee: Chances created, 1.22 xG per 60, 97th percentileAnders Lee: Shot quality, 9.8% a shot, 91st percentileAnders Lee: Finishing, -7.3 goals above expected, 1st percentileDavid Krejci: Goals, 0.21 a game, 60th percentileDavid Krejci: Assists, 0.49 a game, 88th percentileDavid Krejci: Points, 0.70 a game, 80th percentileDavid Krejci: Shots, 1.36 a game, 32nd percentileDavid Krejci: Hits, 0.61 a game, 28th percentileDavid Krejci: Corsi for %, 51.0%, 57th percentileDavid Krejci: CF% rel, 0.9, 54th percentileDavid Krejci: On-ice xG %, 51.8%, 62nd percentileDavid Krejci: Rating, +1.2 goals above replacement, 36th percentileDavid Krejci: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 13th percentileDavid Krejci: Shot quality, 7.7% a shot, 38th percentileDavid Krejci: Finishing, +2.4 goals above expected, 76th percentile
010203040204060Anders Lee 43David Krejci 43

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Anders Lee
David Krejci

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Anders Lee L, UTA 2019-20 David Krejci C, BOS
68 Games played 61
20 Goals 13
23 Assists 30
43 Points 43
0.63 Points per game 0.70
8 Plus/minus 14
195 Shots 83
10.3 Shooting % 15.7
102 Hits 37
47 Penalty minutes 23
18:18 Average ice time 17:10
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.4 Corsi for % 51.0
+7.2 CF% relative to team +0.9
52.1 Fenwick for % 51.1
54.1 Expected goals for % 51.8
+6.2 xGF% relative to team -0.2
51.8 Goals for % 64.8
99.6 PDO 103.6
234 Shot attempts taken 118
Expected goals, all situations
25.3 Expected goals 9.6
1.22 Expected goals per 60 0.55
9.8% Chance per attempt 7.7%
-7.3 Goals above expected +2.4
Rating, in goals
+6.5 Goals above replacement +1.2
+1.1 Wins above replacement +0.2
+5.9 Even-strength offence -2.1
-1.7 Even-strength defence +0.5
-0.8 Power play +0.6
-0.1 Penalty kill -0.5
-0.2 Penalties -0.2
Contract
$7M Cap hit $7.25M
$163K Cap dollars per point $169K
$6.1M Worth at the going rate $1.7M
-$888K Value: worth minus cap hit -$5.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean